Amber jewellery: A dangerous popular trend for toddlers during their teething months and beyond
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Editor, We would like to draw your attention to the problematic popularity of amber teething necklaces being worn by infants and toddlers, despite their risk as a choking hazard. In our Paediatrics clinic in Eastern Canada, we have recently seen two cases of amber teething necklaces worn by infants. These cases each highlight an important issue for physicians to be aware of. Amber is an alternative health product that is often sold as a bracelet or necklace to be worn by an infant or child purportedly to reduce pain associated with teething (Fig. 1).1 Companies selling amber teething jewelry have claimed that it results in numerous benefits in addition to pain relief, such as reducing inflammation and stimulating the thyroid, despite a lack of scientific evidence.2 In addition to a lack of evidence regarding the benefits, these necklaces carry a significant risk of strangulation and choking.3, 4 In the first case, a 10-month old boy, the necklace was used as pain relief during teething. The caregiver mentioned that she would normally take the jewelry off of the child before a physician visit. This highlights the importance of bringing up the issue of teething jewelry even when the physician does not physically see the child wearing it. The second case involved a 3-year-old child who originally started wearing the amber necklace as a young infant for teething pain but continued to wear it as she got older and more mobile as a keepsake. The child refused to let the parents remove the necklace because she had grown attached to the jewelry. This practice strays from the Canadian Pediatric Society recommendations that children up to the age of 4 years should avoid wearing beaded necklaces.4 Health Canada offers a clear position statement to parents and the general public, ‘Health Canada does not recommend using necklaces to prevent or reduce teething pains’.3 They emphasise that parents or caregivers should never put necklaces around a baby or toddler's neck as they can easily catch on household items such as a high chair and strangle the child.3 The Canadian Pediatric Society and American Academy of Pediatrics have also confirmed this recommendation against the use of amber teething jewelry by encouraging parents to avoid baby necklaces as a basic preventative choking and suffocation strategy.2, 4 Amber jewelry is being used both throughout the teething phase and after the child has stopped teething, for pain relief and as a keepsake. Paediatricians and other clinicians should be aware of this popular alternative healthcare product and should provide anticipatory guidance in discouraging their use.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,017 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,013 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».