21st- century learning, educational reform, and tradition: Conceptualizing professional development in a progressive age
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper explores the question: How can we conceptualize and speak about professional development in a progressive age? It draws on the history of education in Canada and on the work of John Dewey to understand the rhetoric of educational reform, particularly as it relates to 21 st Century Learning. It explores a long-standing tension between progressivist and traditionalist thinking in education, which shapes the intellectual spaces and the conversations that frame teaching, learning, and professional development. Progressivist educational ideology has historically concentrated on three aims: a) focus on the individual learner’s aptitudes and interests rather than upon a rigid curriculum developed in a bygone age; b) engage the learner actively in the construction of knowledge, a process prohibited by the memorization and examination of content; and, c) commit to relating school life to the modern world and its concerns, not to the affairs of a world of the past. Progressive education was a tour de force in the 1920s and 1930s, transforming the curricula of every Canadian province and again in the 1960s and 1970s, which marked a second wave of progressive education in Canada. In both instances, progressives pushed against so-called traditionalists, who were seen as overly concentrated on content, out of touch with contemporary society and trends, and focused on rote or passive forms of instruction. The third wave of progressive education is presently sweeping across the country and is, once again, pushing against a seemingly traditional and out of date school system. Its proponents, concerned with what is termed 21 st Century learning, argue that society today is dramatically different from what it was in the past and that schools need to be transformed so that we must prepare our youth for the world of the future. While the themes of 21 st Century learning are consistent with those of past iterations of progressive education, what is new is an unrivaled enthusiasm with technologies and their application to the school. This concentration is not led entirely by educational associations, as technology corporations are intimately involved as partners. The tensions between progressive and traditional education are thus both persistent and rooted in the particular historical context in which they arise. The paper argues that a historically minded approach to educational reform is important for educational stakeholders and helps shape the way we think and speak about professional development. Our contemporary debates often have ancient tones to them, and the rhetoric of Canadian schooling has been consistently torn between the opposing forces, polarizing discussions about teaching, learning, and policy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,082 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».