MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2472584734 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.2843.2843

The Rate of Pregnancy Loss in Von Willebrand Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study

2014· article· en· W2472584734 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Leslie Skeith, Natalia Rydz, M. Dawn Goodyear, Man‐Chiu Poon

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineVon Willebrand diseasePregnancyObstetricsVon Willebrand factorPopulationCross-sectional studyHemostasisPediatricsGynecologyInternal medicinePlateletPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pregnancy and delivery represent a major hemostatic challenge in von Willebrand disease (VWD). In addition to maintaining adequate hemostasis, von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an important regulator of angiogenesis, with angiodysplasia contributing to morbidity in patients with VWD. Placental development is complex, with vascular development important for fetal growth and viability. It has been hypothesized that antepartum bleeding or abnormal placental angiogenesis may lead to pregnancy loss in women with VWD. Large studies have reported an increased risk of postpartum bleeding in patients with VWD, however, little information is available for rates of pregnancy loss. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the rate of pregnancy loss in women with VWD, when compared to a control population. We invited all women with VWD followed by the Southern Alberta Rare Blood and Bleeding Disorders Comprehensive Care Program to participate in an online or paper questionnaire, along with a control group of women without VWD identified through a low-risk obstetrical clinic in Calgary, Alberta. We included patients who were 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of VWD, defined as VWF antigen and activity levels less than 50 percent or a historical diagnosis, in combination with a bleeding score of 4 or more (condensed MCMDM-1 bleeding questionnaire). Patients were excluded if they had no past pregnancies, no mailing address, or had an alternative bleeding disorder. Our 20-item questionnaire was reviewed and pre-tested by hematologists, obstetricians and laypeople. With patient consent, data was supplemented from clinical and hospital records to verify and expand on the information collected in the questionnaire. The primary outcome was the incidence of spontaneous abortion (fetal loss <20 weeks) or late pregnancy loss (≥20 weeks) in women with VWD. The secondary outcomes were antepartum and postpartum bleeding. Data on co-morbidities including placental abnormalities were also collected. Confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Wilson’s score method. Groups were compared using χ2 testing, with p values < 0.05 considered significant. Of the 98 women with VWD who met the study inclusion criteria, 31 (32%) completed the questionnaire. The mean bleeding score was 10.3 in VWD patients (SD 3.6). The majority (81%) of participants were diagnosed with Type 1 VWD, with 16% and 3% diagnosed as Type 2 and 3 VWD, respectively. Twenty-two women in the control group completed the questionnaire. The mean age at recruitment was 46.1 (SD 13.7) and 32.6 (SD 4.2) in the VWD and control group, respectively. There were 83 and 48 pregnancies in the VWD and control group, respectively. Two women in the VWD group and 1 woman in the control group had an elective pregnancy termination. In women with VWD, the rate of pregnancy loss was 24.7% out of 81 pregnancies (95% confidence interval 16.6-35.1), with 17 (85%) losses occurring less than 20 weeks, and 3 (15%) with unknown timing. In contrast, the rate of pregnancy loss in the control group was 12.8% (95% CI 5.96-25.17) (p=0.106), all occurring less than 20 weeks. In 83 pregnancies, the number of antepartum bleeding episodes in VWD women was 45 (29 first trimester, 9 second trimester, 7 third trimester), compared to the control group (9 first trimester, 3 second trimester, 1 third trimester) in 48 pregnancies. More women with VWD reported excessive postpartum bleeding compared to controls (56.7% versus 13.6%, p=0.002), with more delayed (>24 hour) bleeding post-delivery in women with VWD. In VWD women with and without pregnancy loss, there was no difference in mean bleeding score (9.7 vs. 10.9). There was also no difference in cases of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption or gestational hypertension in VWD women with and without pregnancy loss. Two VWD patients with previous pregnancy loss developed gastrointestinal angiodysplasia later in life. There was no significant increase in the rate of pregnancy loss in women with VWD, however, a larger cohort study is needed to confirm the rate of pregnancy loss before further conclusions can be made. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetPlatelet Disorders and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→