Abstract 1342: A production-scalable cabazitaxel cellulose nanoparticle exhibits significant efficacy in a bone model of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the antitumor efficacy of a controlled release cabazitaxel cellulose nanoparticle (CBZed-Nano) in an orthotopic bone model of docetaxel-resistant LNCaP C4-2B prostate cancer, and (2) confirm the efficacy of dose preparation by scalable instrumentation (NanoAssemblr), in a subcutaneous PC3 prostate xenograft model. Methods: mPEG-OH and cabazitaxel (CBZ) were coupled to a carboxymethylcellulose acetate polymer to yield CBZed-Nano, according to established coupling and purification methods (1). Particles were prepared by nanoprecipitation of polymer into saline by either a manual vortex technique (1) or a NanoAssemblr™ (NA) microfluidic-based instrument. Particles were purified by dialysis and sterile filtration (1). Particle size was measured by a DLS Malvern Zetasizer, morphology was screened by TEM, and residual substances were measured by LC. Male NOD-SCID mice were inoculated via intrafemoral injection with docetaxel-resistant LNCaP C42B prostate cancer. One day after inoculation, mice were treated with vortex prep CBZed-Nano (55 mg/kg) or CBZ (2 mg/kg) on a q1,5,9d schedule. Survival curves were generated (n = 10 mice per group). To directly compare preparation technique, nude mice bearing s.c. PC3 prostate cancer xenografts were treated at Bolder BioPath (Boulder, US) with CBZed-Nano (NA and vortex prep, 85 to 142 mg/kg) and CBZ (15-25 mg/kg) on a q1,5,9d schedule. Results: The CBZed-Nano polymer conjugate contained 36 wt% CBZ and 11 wt% PEG, with residual free CBZ < 0.01 wt% of CBZ content. Particles prepared by vortex and NA were 94 and 70 nm respectively (by DLS). By TEM analysis, NA particles exhibit a more uniform spherical morphology. Mice bearing docetaxel resistant LNCaP C42B tumors exhibited a partial response to CBZ treatment, with a median survival of 61 days, compared to 34 days for vehicle controls. In contrast, mice treated with CBZed-Nano exhibited a significantly improved response, with 70% durable cure. Efficacy was observed regardless of CBZed-Nano preparation technique. Mice treated with CBZ exhibited a 38-63% durable cure in the 60, 75, and 100% MTD groups. In comparison, mice treated with CBZed-Nano exhibited a 92-100% durable cure, confirming both the superior activity of CBZed-Nano relative to free CBZ, and confirming antitumor activity of the scalable NanoAssemblr production. Conclusion: The CBZed-Nano preparation technique is scalable, with manual and NanoAssemblr™ produced dose being equally efficacious in a PC3 prostate cancer model. Significant efficacy (70% durable cure) in a docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer of the bone model was also observed. The data suggests that CBZed-Nano is more tolerable than CBZ, and that it may overcome taxane-resistant solid tumor indications. (1) Bioconjugate Chem 22 2011, 2474-2486 (2) Biomaterials 33 2012, 3931-3941 Citation Format: Joseph Bteich, Bryan Hoang, Elijus Undzys, Mohammed Mohammed, Ai Lin Su, Kevin Ou, David Emerson, Kenneth Sokoll, Shyh-Dar Li, Mohit Trikha, Henry Lowman, Mark J. Ernsting. A production-scalable cabazitaxel cellulose nanoparticle exhibits significant efficacy in a bone model of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1342.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».