MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W247677492

Beyond Spectacle: Eliza Haywood's Female Spectators

2004· article· en· W247677492 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueARIEL · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSpectacleScholarshipSociologyPublishingLiteratureMedia studiesHistoryAestheticsArtLawPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Juliette Merritt. Beyond Spectacle: Eliza Haywood's Female Spectators. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2004. Pp. 154. $45.00. The number of texts exploring work by eighteenth-century women writers has grown exponentially since the early 1990s. 'Scandalous' authors such as Eliza Haywood have acquired respectable reputations denied them in their own historical moment as feminist scholarship investigates the consequences of women writing and publishing their work. Many now consider Haywood a subversive author who criticizes the societal constructs imposed upon women in her time, yet works within the confines of the social order that governed her publication, her livelihood, and her public persona. Beyond Spectacle situates itself solidly within this body of recent feminist scholarship on Haywood. In her introduction, Juliette Merritt admirably summarizes recent Haywood scholarship. For the uninitiated, this introduction serves as a useful entry into important critical debates surrounding Haywood's work. She includes a brief outline of several issues, including the public sphere of the literary marketplace, commercial aspects of publication, and women's roles within these spaces. Haywood scholars might find this comprehensive background familiar, but the information proves useful as Merritt frames her own assertions. Rather than insisting upon a narrowly focused thesis, Merritt uses the eighteenth-century woman and her relationship with the male gaze as an entry into an investigation of elements of eighteenth-century spectacle found in Haywood's fiction and their influence on women's daily reality. Merritt is interested in the visual/linguistic nexus for its capacity to increase women's access to knowledge and (9), and Haywood's treatment of this nexus to establish agency. In an era when men gaze and control while women are gazed at and controlled, Haywood's appropriation of this spectacle rein-scribes a level of power, and therefore agency, to female protagonists. The opening chapter analyses Haywood's first novel, Love in Excess, the amatory novel that made her famous. Merritt brings together ideas of female sexuality and visual desire and explores them in the framework of contemporary scientific discourse, which relied on rational, objective observation. She notes Haywood's rejection of such discourse as exclusively masculine in order to achieve political resistance for her female characters. In Haywood's fiction, women as well as men exhibit desire by directing their gaze in particular directions. Merritt's discussion focuses on the binaries of feminine/masculine, object/subject, spectacle/spectator and the moment of power resulting from the protagonist's ability to take advantage of the inherent instability of such categories and to move between the two realms. The second chapter shifts to masquerade and the performance of the female gaze in Haywood's Fantomina. Immensely popular in the eighteenth century, masquerades were extravagant balls open to those who could afford the price of admission and an ornate costume. Liberated from everyday societal constraints by masks, those who attended masquerades practiced an otherwise unknown abandon in opulent surroundings. Underlying this seemingly harmless entertainment was the fear that such disguise would escape from the ballroom into everyday life for the purpose of deception, as occurs in Haywood's Fantomina. Throughout the text, Fantomina constantly changes her identity in order to pursue a fickle lover. Merritt argues that Haywood's use of masquerade is a literal use of costuming and mannerisms in order to shift the female character from a position of object to that of subject. The protagonist becomes the spectacle, but through a choice that accords her a measure of power over her own sexuality. Intertwined with this complex model of sexual identity are questions of class and social mobility. Merritt examines the complications that arise from the protagonist being a gentlewoman with the means to support a disguise that imitates women of lower classes. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,923
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,201
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle