Reliability of the SWAG—The Standardized Way to Assess Grafts Method for Alveolar Bone Grafting in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate
Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Le tri à trois modèles
les 1 000 travaux triés →Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a radiographic scale for grading bone grafts; clinical instrument reliability in the measurement sense, a polysemy trap rather than metaresearch.
This study tests the reliability of a clinical graft-assessment instrument rather than research practice.
Interrater reliability of a clinical graft-assessment scale; clinical measurement validation, polysemy trap not research reproducibility.
Résumé
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test a new method, a Standardized Way to Assess Grafts (SWAG), to rate alveolar bone graft (ABG) outcomes for patients with cleft lip and palate. DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparison using the SWAG scale. SETTING: This study took place in four cleft palate centers with different treatment protocols. METHODS: A total of 160 maxillary occlusal radiographs taken 3 to 18 months post-ABG for sequentially treated patients with cleft lip and palate were assessed using the SWAG scale. Radiographs were scanned, standardized, blinded, and rated by 6 calibrated orthodontists to assess vertical thirds, bony root coverage, and complete bony fill. All radiographs were rated twice, 24 hours apart, by the same raters. MAIN OUTCOMES: Intra- and interrater reliabilities were assessed. RESULTS: Intrarater reliability was good to very good (.760; .652-.834), and interrater reliability was moderate to good (.606; .569-.681), comparable to previously published methods. CONCLUSIONS: Rater reliabilities were shown to be comparable to or better than existing methods. The SWAG method was validated for ABG assessments in the mixed and permanent dentitions based on reliabilities in an intercenter outcome comparison.
Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.
La notice
- Revue
- The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
- Thématique
- Cleft Lip and Palate Research
- Domaine
- Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
- Établissements canadiens
- SickKids FoundationDalhousie University
- Organismes subventionnaires
- —
- Mots-clés
- MedicineGraftingDentistryBone graftingReliability (semiconductor)OrthodonticsDental alveolusSurgery
- Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
- oui