The Role of the p53 Tumour Suppressor Protein in Relation to the Sensing of Ionizing Radiation-induced DNA Double-strand Breaks
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Our cells are constantly dealing with DNA damage generated by endogenous cellular activity (e.g. DNA replication) and exogenous agents (e.g. ultraviolet and ionizing radiation (IR)). The cellular stress response to DNA damage requires strict co-ordination between cell cycle checkpoint control and DNA repair. In response to DNA double-strand breaks (DNA-dsbs), members of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase–related kinase family (e.g. ATM and DNA-PKcs kinases) have been shown to redundantly phosphorylate substrates including the DNA-dsb marker, gamma-H2AX, and the p53 tumour suppressor protein. The p53 protein is best known as the guardian of the genome through its transcriptional-dependent and -independent functions. \n\nDespite a clear link between ATM-dependent phosphorylation of p53 with cell cycle checkpoint control and various modes of DNA damage repair, the intracellular biology and sub-cellular localization of p53 and specifically its phosphoforms during DNA damage induction and repair remains poorly characterized. Using G0/G1 confluent primary human diploid fibroblast cultures, this thesis shows that endogenous p53, phosphorylated at serine 15 (p53Ser15), accumulates as discrete, dose-dependent and chromatin-bound foci within 30 minutes following the induction of DNA breaks. This biologically distinct sub-pool of p53Ser15 is ATM-dependent and resistant to 26S-proteasomal degradation. p53Ser15 co-localizes and co-immunoprecipitates with gamma-H2AX with kinetics similar to that of biochemical DNA-dsb rejoining. Sub-nuclear microbeam irradiation studies confirm that p53Ser15 is recruited to sites of DNA damage containing gamma-H2AX, ATMSer1981 and DNA-PKcsThr2609 in vivo. Furthermore, studies using isogenic human and murine cells, which express Ser15 or Ser18 phosphomutant proteins, respectively, show defective nuclear foci formation, decreased induction of p21WAF, decreased gamma-H2AX-association and altered DNA-dsb kinetics following DNA damage. \n\nWe further hypothesized that the non-specific DNA binding activity of the p53 carboxy-terminus mediates chromatin anchoring at sites of DNA damage. YFP-p53 fusion constructs expressing carboxy-terminus deletion mutants of p53 were transfected into p53-null H1299 cells to determine the role of the carboxy-terminus in chromatin-binding pre- and post-IR, independent of transcriptional activity. Within this isogenic human cell system, we observed exogenous YFP-p53WT associated with ATMSer1981 and 53BP1 within cellular chromatin in a dynamic manner. We confirmed that these associations also occurred between endogenous WTp53 with ATMSer1981 and 53BP1 within the chromatin of primary human diploid fibroblasts. YFP-p53del1-299 fusion proteins, which lack transcriptional activity and the Ser15-residue, also associated within chromatin. Ser15-phosphorylation was found not to be essential for DNA damage-induced association of p53 with chromatin or with ATMSer1981 and 53BP1. These data suggest a unique biology for p53Ser15 phosphoforms in the initial steps of DNA damage signaling and implicates ATM-p53-53BP1 chromatin-based interactions as mediators of cell cycle checkpoint control and DNA repair. And we propose a model whereby a pre-existing pool of p53 that constantly scans the genome, responds immediately to radiation-induced DNA damage by virtue of its association with chromatin through its carboxy-terminus.\n\nThe consequences for these p53-ATMSer1981-53BP1 complexes following DNA damage remains to be investigated: could residual complexes be associated with decreased DNA-dsb rejoining or error-prone repair, or could these complexes signal for cell survival or cell death? Since altered p53 function and biology is an important factor in cellular carcinogenesis and response to cancer therapy, this study provides a step towards a greater understanding of WTp53 and MTp53 biology in tumour development and therapeutic resistance, in the hopes to contribute towards predicting therapeutic response and/or improving p53-targeted therapies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».