The evolution of an undergraduate medical program on professionalism and identity formation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sow an act, and you reap a habit. Sow a habit and you reap a character. Sow a character, and you reap a destiny. Charles Reade Introduction “How can I do that and still be me ?” Reflections of this nature by medical students are often found in the literature. 1 The belief that medical education has the potential to form, transform, and perhaps even deform a person's core values or sense of self is commonly assumed by learners and teachers alike. The process has been explicated using various concepts, most notably medical character, 2 ethical comportment, 3 moral epistemology, 4 humanism in medicine, 5 and professionalism. 6 More recently, particularly in North America, discussions on the topic have taken a turn toward the conceptual framework of identity. The concepts of identity and “self-hood” are not new to many academic disciplines, including philosophy, psychology, and anthropology. Identity also has an honorable tradition in medical education. For example, in a research program that culminated in the influential 1957 publication, The Student Physician , sociologist Robert Merton and coauthors incorporated psychological perspectives on identity. 8 Of late, however, identity seems to have acquired a privileged status as an analytical tool in understanding the phenomenon of “becoming a doctor.” A series of critical inquiries into professional education, funded by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, has recently been completed. It has identified the signature pedagogies of various professions and has suggested a clear direction for the teaching of professionalism in the twenty-first century. One of its primary conclusions is that students undergo personal transformations during their educational experiences. The study on educating the clergy focused on “pedagogies of formation.” 9 The one that examined nursing practices referred to the teaching of “being, knowing, and doing.” 10 The authors of the book on medical education discussed “identity formation,” by which was meant the transmission of professional values and commitments. 11 That series has reinforced the conviction of many that medical education should be reframed so that it actively supports professional identity formation. This chapter is focused on the Physicianship Program at McGill University's Faculty of Medicine. It describes the teaching of professionalism from a perspective that is tightly coupled to the development of attributes considered necessary for the good doctor.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».