Prevalence of Suspected Collagen Disorders In the Adult Bleeding Disorder Clinic.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1399 Background: Disorders of collagen may be associated with a mild bleeding tendency because of the interaction of collagen with von Willebrand factor (VWF) and platelets required during primary hemostasis and generalized soft tissue fragility. Therefore, collagen disorders may be unrecognized contributors to existing disorders of primary hemostasis. Synergism between these entities could produce a more significant bleeding tendency than predicted based on laboratory abnormalities alone. Symptomatic joint hypermobility (SJH) is found in over 90% of collagen disorders and can be objectively measured as a surrogate marker of a potential collagen disorder. Objective: To determine the prevalence of suspected collagen disorders in a cohort of adult subjects with mucocutaneous inherited bleeding disorders in comparison to healthy controls using SJH as a marker for a potential collagen disorder. Methods: Fifty-five consecutive subjects, ≥ 16 years of age, attending the Adult Bleeding Disorders (BD) Clinic with a history of von Willebrand disease, platelet function disorder or undefined bleeding disorder and 60 controls (age and sex-matched) were enrolled between June 2008 and February 2010. All subjects were assessed for: i) Generalized joint hypermobility, defined using the Beighton score whereby a score of ≥ 4 out of 9 is considered positive; ii) SJH, defined using the major Brighton criteria which is a Beighton score of ≥ 4 AND arthralgia for longer than 3 months in 4 or more joints; and, iii) Bleeding score (BS), using the Condensed MCMDM1-VWD, with a positive score defined as ≥ 4 for both sexes. CBC, blood group, VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, FVIII:C and closure times were collected prospectively in the control group and retrospectively in the clinic subjects in addition to bleeding time and platelet aggregation studies. Results: The prevalence of SJH with a positive bleeding score was 24% in the BD clinic and 1.6% in controls (see table). Seventy-seven percent of SJH subjects (10/13) in the BD clinic had a prior personal or family history of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, other Joint Hypermobility Syndrome or Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI). Only the OI subject had prior clinical documentation of a collagen disorder. There was no statistical difference in laboratory measures of hemostasis or bleeding score in the BD clinic subjects with or without SJH. Of interest, mean bleeding time in the BD clinic subjects (available in 38 subjects) was 10.5 minutes in the SJH group and 10 minutes in the non-SJH group suggesting that bleeding time is not a good screening test for the presence of abnormal collagen. Isolated joint hypermobility (Beighton score of ≥ 4) not associated with arthralgia was common in both groups (40% and 30% respectively) in this predominately female population of subjects with inherited mucocutaneous bleeding. Conclusions: SJH suggesting a collagen disorder is common and often unrecognized in the BD clinic as a potential contributor to the bleeding symptoms. Asymptomatic joint hypermobility is common in this predominately female population and not an adequate screening tool for a potential collagen disorder. A prolonged bleeding time did not predict the presence of SJH in this cohort. Further study is required to confirm the nature of collagen disorders in the BD clinic population and the relationship to bleeding manifestations. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».