MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W248209261

TD Waterhouse's Banner Year -- and Bull's Eve Focus

2000· article· en· W248209261 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lauren Bielski

Notice bibliographique

RevueABA banking journal · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueFinance, Markets, and Regulation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBusinessInvestment bankingFinanceTelecommunicationsCommerceEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Its early embrace of self-directed investors using a strategy of wired wireless as well as is making this broker a bundle It's no wonder, really, that Frank Petrilli doesn't like to comment on the competition. The president chief operating officer of TD Waterhouse is hip to the media game naturally wily. He also seems well aware that his business is so competitive--and so in transition--that the best way to handle is probably to say very little about the next guy. Still, Petrilli wasn't all that shy at the recent Retail Delivery Conference. There, he thanked bankers for getting in comments about customer acquisition service. Nor was he unwilling to make comparisons when he implied that his company's approach to customer service, it's adoption of a clicks bricks strategy, its investment in wireless technology was filling a void of commercial banks' own making. In fact, TD Waterhouse is somewhat in a position to postulate on success. Formed by the 1996 acquisition of Waterhouse Securities by Toronto-Dominion Bank, bolstered by seven acquisitions around the globe in the time since, is the third largest online broker in the U.S. 13.3% of the U.S. market, a stock price of $16.87 per share as of this writing, is cash rich enough to make acquisitions, too. And the #2 worldwide discount broker's not afraid of technology. At a time when many banks full-service brokerage firms are attempting a toe dip into the Internet emerging wireless technologies to hang onto customers, TD Waterhouse is already in the deep end of the ocean. Specifically, it's made investments in both wireless technology electronic communication network technology for after-hours trading, reached out to markets as diverse as India Japan, opened up new accounts in North America, all while eyeballing Europe the Far East for next-stage growth. All this, notes Petrilli with some satisfaction, has occurred in the wake of the Internet's success, which has expanded the company's reach cut distribution costs. With the arrival of the Internet, the investor got access confidence, says the chief operating officer. The Monday that preceded the telephone interview with ABA Banking Journal illustrates the point: when the discount broker opened for business, about 70,000 orders were waiting in queue. That was typical--and that is the power of the Net. Focusing on improving its infrastructure, reaching the minds wallets of the self-directed investor is making TD Waterhouse significant gains: the firm landed net income of $97.3 million in 1999, up from $48.7 million in the previous year. Still, some analysts question just how different the broker is from market leader, Schwab. Again, Petrilli doesn't make comparisons, but points out what he sees as self-evident truths. Our business model revolves around the customer. We're successful because we make that relationship work. provide investment services convenient access rather than selling products, he said. Petrilli maintains that this is not the model typically employed by banks, at least not in the past. Banks still own the deposit base in this country, he points out, and when they exclusively owned the deposit base, they paid low interest charged customers fees for access. He adds: We find that when we handle our customers' assets fairly, provide unbiased sources of investment information, they are more than happy to give us more business. That, by the way, is the it that, in Petrilli's estimation, bankers hadn't yet gotten. Internet world The company went public last June. (The brokerage, headquartered in New York City, has T.D. Bank, Toronto as its principal shareholder.) Raising $1 billion, invested $750 million of that into its operations. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,283
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,948

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,002
Communication savante0,0130,008
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2830,096

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,173
Écart entre enseignants0,162 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueABA banking journalMême sujetFinance, Markets, and RegulationTravaux en français237 207