MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2483350877 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.1742.1742

A Phase 2 Study of Ofatumumab in Combination with a Pan-AKT Inhibitor (Afuresertib) in Previously Treated Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

2015· article· en· W2483350877 sur OpenAlexaff
Christine I. Chen, Susi Snitzler, О. А. Левина, Tong Wang, Lisa W. Le, Harminder Paul, Ellen Wei, Anthea Lau, Michelle L. Queau, James B. Johnston, Suzanne Trudel, Deborah A. Smith

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensGlaxoSmithKline (Canada)CancerCare ManitobaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOfatumumabMedicineFludarabineInternal medicineChronic lymphocytic leukemiaRefractory (planetary science)RegimenGastroenterologyNeutropeniaPhases of clinical researchPharmacodynamicsOncologyPharmacologyPharmacokineticsLeukemiaClinical trialCyclophosphamideChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Ofatumumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with single-agent responses of 47-58% in refractory CLL (Wierda et al 2010) and a median response duration ranging from 5.6-7.1 months. In order to improve upon these results, we combined ofatumumab with afuresertib, a pan-AKT kinase inhibitor. The AKT pathway plays a centralized role in tumor differentiation, migration, proliferation and survival and is frequently aberrantly activated in CLL (Longo et al 2007). Single agent afuresertib is very well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity in hematologic malignancies (Spencer et al ASH 2011). We present results from 27 of 31 planned patients (pts) in a trial of ofatumumab and afuresertib in relapsed/refractory CLL. Methods: Pts withCLL relapsed/refractory to at least one fludarabine-containing regimen were eligible. During the initial 6 month Treatment Phase, ofatumumab 2000mg IV was administered weekly for 8 doses, then once every 4 weeks for 4 doses (dose/schedule identical to the pivotal phase 2 trial) with afuresertib 125mg orally daily. An initial 10 day Lead-in Phase with afuresertib alone allowed for evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies. Patients achieving SD, PR or CR by the end of the Treatment Phase proceeded to the Maintenance Phase with single-agent afuresertib for a maximum of 12 4-week cycles. Results: Demographics: Of the 27 patients enrolled, the median age was 63 yrs (range 43-76), absolute lymphocytes 60.4 x109 /L (range 1.0-464), β2M 5.1mg/L (range 1.1-16.6). High risk features included: FISH with del17p/del11q in 10 pts (37%), ZAP70+ in 20 pts (74%) and unmutated IgVH status in 18 pts (72%). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-6). Eleven pts (41%) were fludarabine-refractory but only 3 (11%) had received prior alemtuzumab. Toxicity: Hematologic: Gr 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 10 pts (37%) and thrombocytopenia (without bleeding) in 8 pts (30%) during at least 1 cycle of treatment. Only 1 pt (4%) developed febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity: Most common toxicities (all grades) were infusion reactions (70%), upper respiratory infections (74%), dyspepsia (59%), cough (70%), and diarrhea (56%). Dyspepsia was temporally related to oral afuresertib and managed symptomatically. Of the 19 pts (70%) who had infusion reactions to the ofatumumab, only 3 were grade 3-4 (non-fatal, all cycle 1). Grade 3-4 non-infectious pneumonitis, attributed to ofatumumab, occurred in 3 pts (11%), with 2 pts requiring hospitalization. Two pts with preexisting atrial arrhythmias sustained exacerbation during weekly ofatumumab infusions. Most infections were mild, with grade 3 upper respiratory infections (2 pts), pneumonia (4 pts), and skin infection (1 pt). There were no grade 4 infections. Efficacy: The median number of study cycles was 8 (2-19). Of all 27 response-evaluable pts, 12 pts (44%) achieved a PR, 14 SD (52%), and 1 CR (4%) = overall response rate 48%. Response onset was rapid (median 1.4 mos). Nineteen pts did not complete treatment protocol due to: disease progression 12 pts (44%), toxicity 5 pts (19%), and patient preference 2 pts (7%). At a median follow-up of 9.5 mos, the median PFS is 8.6 mos (95% CI: 7.4-13.9) and OS not yet reached. PD Studies: CD19+ cells were assayed for phosphorylated AKT and downstream targets RAS40 and GSK3, in addition to phospho-proteins of alternative pathways including ERK and pS6 by multiplexed phospho-flow cytometry. Blood samples collected at screening demonstrated constitutive AKT phosphorylation. Partial inhibition of AKT signaling evidenced by increased phosphorylation of AKT and inhibition of GSK3 and/or RAS40 phosphorylation in response to BCR stimulation was observed post-treatment, indicating target engagement by afuresertib. PK Studies: Afuresertib exposure (Cmax and AUC) was similar when afuresertib was administered alone or in combination with ofatumumab. Conclusion: This phase 2 study of 27 previously treated CLL pts, 40% with fludarabine-refractory disease, demonstrates that the addition of an oral AKT inhibitor, afuresertib, to ofatumumab has anti-tumor activity and is generally well-tolerated with minimal myelotoxicity. Although this combination works rapidly with a response onset of 1.4 mos, the moderate response rate of 48% and PFS of 8.6 mos suggest that this combination may not provide significant benefit over single agent ofatumumab. Disclosures Chen: Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria; Lundbeck: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Afuresertib is not currently approved for use in CLL.. Trudel:BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,013

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,269 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207