Patrons sociolinguistiques chez trois générations de locuteurs acadiens
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Verbs in Acadian French mark third-person-plural subject-verb agreement with the traditional suffix - ont , that is realized by the nasal vowel /õ/ ( les enfants i-jou-ont “the children play”), as well as by the zero morpheme that is generally found in contemporary French and that is represented in writing as - ent ( les enfants i-jou-ent, les enfants jou-ent ). This study reports on variation in the use of these forms by three generations of speakers from northeastern New Brunswick (Canada) and addresses Labov’s “transmission problem”: how children learn to talk differently from their parents, and yet in the same direction, over several generations. Data from a stratified corpus of 16 adult speakers show an ongoing change: the zero morpheme is replacing the traditional - ont suffix. The main external factor that conditions this variation is social network: speakers with closed affi liation networks tend to conserve the traditional variant while those who have open networks use the zero morpheme almost exclusively. Among closed network speakers there is a significant age-by-gender interaction: older males have the highest frequencies of occurrence of the traditional -ont variant followed by younger females; younger males and older females have the lowest frequencies. The main internal conditioning factor is verb class, where classes are arranged according to the number of bases or stems. Verb classes with a small number of bases (for example, arriver “to arrive”, appeler “to call”) are more likely to be associated with conservation of the traditional suffix, while those with larger numbers of stems (including verbs such as avoir “to have”, aller “to go”, faire “to do” that have suppletive forms) are less likely. The corpus of children’s data includes recordings made with 24 speakers in three age groups (3–5, 7–9 and 10–12 years of age). The distribution of the traditional - ont suffix with respect to social network is the same as that found among adults: as early as 3 to 5 years of age, children from families with closed networks use the traditional form almost exclusively while those from open network families use it infrequently, favouring the zero morpheme. However, among all children from closed network families, the frequency of use of the traditional variant is considerably higher than among adult speakers. Furthermore, unlike the pattern observed for adult speakers, there are no significant gender differences at any age level. With respect to the “transmission problem” the results show that the verb class constraint that is formulated by children is not identical with adults’ patterns, but it does resemble more closely the model of adult women speakers than that of adult male speakers. Interestingly, the process of re-structuring the internal constraint on the traditional – ont suffix variation begins relatively late (in the 10–12 year group) when compared with ages reported for the acquisition of constraints on phonological variation. The results of this study provide evidence for a complex picture of the acquisition of sociolinguistic competence; the acquisition of social and linguistic constraints on variation does not follow a clear linear order where social patterning is acquired before (or after) linguistic constraints.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,020 | 0,059 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,020 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».