An Unusual Case of Acquired Hemophilia a and Factor XIII Consumption
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) results from auto-antibodies that neutralize factor VIII (FVIII) coagulant function. AHA is rare, usually occurring late in life, and occasionally post-partum. It is most often idiopathic, but can be associated with malignancy, autoimmunity, or drugs. In contrast to congenital hemophilia, AHA generally manifests as mucocutaneous bleeding, with poor correlation to antibody titer or residual FVIII activity. Management goals are the achievement of hemostasis and antibody eradication. Here we describe an unusual case of AHA and concomitant factor XIII consumption in a young nulliparous woman. CASE REPORT: A 24-year-old woman with a symptomatic congenital choledochal cyst underwent a Roux-en-Y bypass, bile duct resection and cholecystectomy. Abdominal sepsis ensued from extended spectrum beta-lactamase Klebsiella, with ertapenem initiation on post-operative day (POD) 5. On POD6 she developed severe intra-abdominal bleeding associated with prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) from 35 seconds (pre-operative) to 40 seconds (reference interval 28-35 seconds). On POD10, FVIII activity and FVIII inhibitor titer, using the modified Nijmegen Bethesda assay, were measured at 0.08 U/ml and 4.5 BU/ml, respectively. In addition to supportive transfusion therapy, the patient received a sequence of desmopressin (0.3 mcg/kg IV), recombinant FVIII (50 U/kg), and activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) (50-75 U/kg IV q8h) with tranexamic acid (10-20 mg/kg IV q8h) from POD13-20. Prednisone was concomitantly initiated (1.5 mg/kg/day) (Figure 1). Bleeding persisted despite reduction in clotting time on rotational thromboelastometry post-aPCC. As neither intensified aPCC nor recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) (80 mcg/kg IV q2h) provided substantial benefit, recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII) was administered from POD20-28 (100 U/kg IV qd). RpFVIII resulted in hemostatic improvement until anti-porcine FVIII antibodies developed on POD27. On POD28, she was transferred to the local hemophilia treatment center where complete factor analysis identified concurrent FXIII deficiency [0.08 U/ml] using a latex immunoassay. FXIII inhibitor analysis using a chromogenic assay was negative. The peak FVIII inhibitor titer and nadir FVIII activity were 74 BU/ml and <0.01 U/ml, respectively. APCC was resumed [POD28-37] and plasma derived factor XIII (pdFXIII) was given every 4 days to maintain FXIII >0.20 U/ml. The patient was also treated with rituximab [POD28,36,43,50]. On POD37, massive intra-abdominal bleeding prompted sequential aPCC, rFVIIa and pd von Willebrand factor (VWF):FVIII concentrate. Once the FVIII inhibitor titer began to wane, bypassing therapy was discontinued and she was managed solely with pdVWF:FVIII. On POD47 all FVIII-related support was discontinued, as the FVIII inhibitor was undetectable and endogenous FVIII normalized. Her FXIII consumption and requirement for FXIII replacement, however, persisted. DISCUSSION: The unusual features of this case of AHA include the patient's young age, the possible triggers for the FVIII inhibitor (extensive abdominal surgery, sepsis, and/or carbapenem use), and concomitant FXIII deficiency. We hypothesize that FXIII deficiency was secondary to consumption from the massive abdominal wound given its persistence despite normalization of hepatic function. Repeated life-threatening bleeding required trials of multiple hemostatic agents. Persistent and prolonged bleeding despite ongoing FVIII replacement should trigger investigation for a concomitant hemostatic deficiency. AHA is a rare condition, and treatment requires intensive monitoring, clinical experience and specialized laboratory support. Current guidelines are largely derived from expert opinion, and contemporary case descriptions for rare disorders are essential to advance options in best care. Figure 1. Case summary outlining clinical course, factor activity levels, and management strategies Figure 1. Case summary outlining clinical course, factor activity levels, and management strategies Disclosures St. Louis: Baxter/Baxalta: Consultancy. Sholzberg:CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».