Pediatric Nephrology Training Worldwide 2016: Quantum Educatus?

Pediatric nephrology training is, by necessity, extensive. Pediatric nephrologists typically care for highly complex patients in tertiary academic medical centers, where they provide consultation and direct care to inpatients and outpatients and provide vital services to critically ill children. In most settings, practicing pediatric nephrologists also teach medical students, pediatric trainees, and nurses. Preparing neophyte pediatric nephrologists requires extensive education and experience in both inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as exposure to research, research methods, and faculty development. A high degree of perceived workforce inadequacy and difficulty recruiting pediatric nephrology trainees exists in most regions of the world.1Glenn D. Ocegueda S. Nazareth M. et al.The Global Pediatric Nephrology Workforce: A Survey of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association.BMC Nephrol. 2016; 17: 83Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar Concern about workforce adequacy in the United States has generated a discussion as to whether offering a shortened 2-year clinical track, as in adult nephrology, would increase the number of fellowship applicants. There is considerable tension, however, between meeting clinical training needs and the desire for pediatric nephrologists to be trained in research, since most work in academic settings. Requirements for qualification as a pediatric nephrologist vary from country to country. This report is a “snapshot” of requirements for training and certification for pediatric nephrologists around the world as of the beginning of 2016. This report also contains data on the opinions of U.S.-trained pediatric nephrologists on the value of a 2-year versus a 3-year fellowship. This report is based on e-mail contact with selected pediatric nephrologists worldwide and a separate survey of U.S.-trained pediatric nephrologists. E-mail messages were sent to pediatric nephrologists in countries with ≥25 contacts listed in the on-line International Pediatric Nephrology Association (IPNA) member directory2IPNA. Available at: http://www.ipna-online.org/members/member-directory/. Accessed December 15, 2015.Google Scholar and selected countries where pediatric nephrology training occurs. No queries were sent to the United States, since the authors could provide the required data. IPNA councilors and IPNA Committee members were preferentially queried because they are usually representatives of the pediatric nephrology societies or considered representative of the pediatric nephrology community in their country. There are currently 42 IPNA councilors and officers representing 22 countries. If no IPNA member met those criteria, if no response was received, or if conflicting information was provided, random IPNA members were selected to receive the e-mail. The email asked for the number of years of medical school, years of pediatric training, and years of pediatric nephrology fellowship required in the contact’s country, and whether a certifying board exists. In Spring 2013, all pediatric nephrologists who had ever been American Board of Pediatric (ABP) Nephrology eligible, were members of the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN), or were members of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Pediatric Nephrology (SONp) received an e-mail survey. Detailed results of this survey have been published.3Primack W. Meyers K. Kirkwood S. et al.The US Pediatric Nephrology Workforce: A Report Commissioned by the American Academy of Pediatrics.Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 66: 33-39Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar However data from the following question was not included in the published report: “There is discussion about offering 2 fellowship tracks─a traditional 3-year academic track and a 2 year clinical track as in adult nephrology. In your opinion, would this be wise for pediatric nephrology? Please feel free to share any comments you have about this possibility.” (Supplement Q.43) For this report, we collected and analyzed all free text responses to this survey question. Table 1 lists the number of years required for medical school, pediatric training, and pediatric nephrology fellowship in all countries with ≥25 contacts in the online IPNA directory as of the end of 2015, as well as several smaller countries with <25 IPNA contacts but with robust pediatric nephrology services. Responses were received from all 31 countries queried, with the exception of Indonesia. The number of years of medical school varies according to the amount of education required before entry. Similarly, the number of years of pediatric experience as prequalification to entry to pediatric nephrology training varies based on the length of medical school. Many countries require a period of rotating internship prior to pediatric training. About two-thirds of surveyed countries have some form of formal certification for pediatric nephrologists, and most require 3 years of specific pediatric nephrology training. The February 2015 ESPN guidelines4Recommendations for training of European pediatric nephrologists by the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology. 2105. Available at: http://espn-online.org/training_doc.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2016.Google Scholar and the 2014 Australian and New Zealand guidelines5ANZSN. Advanced training in nephrology: 2015 requirements handbook. 2015. Available at: https://www.racp.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/nephrology-at-hb-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed February 24, 2016.Google Scholar recommend that all countries in those regions have a minimum of 3 years for certification.Table 1Length of training required for pediatric nephrology certificationCountryMedical schoolPediatric trainingPediatric nephrologyCertificationNo. IPNA contactsU.S.433Yes720Japan653Yes278Brazil632 or 3Yes124India51 rot/3 ped3 mo−2 yrYesa3 Years for DM degree.102United Kingdom5 or 62 or 53No98Germany64 or 53b1 Year pediatrics included in fellowship.Yes77Turkey3Primack W. Meyers K. Kirkwood S. et al.The US Pediatric Nephrology Workforce: A Report Commissioned by the American Academy of Pediatrics.Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 66: 33-39Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar6c7 Years medical school if cannot pass English.43Yes63Argentina6 or 74 or 53Yes57Canada3 or 43 or 42Yes55China5 or 833No53Italy652 to 3No52France742No49Australia61–2 rot/33Yes43Netherlands64.52.5Yes42Spain63 or 41No41Saudi71 rot/4 ped2Yes39Mexico632Yes37Russia61–24 mo−2 yr??35Nigeria65 to 7Not specifiedNo35Philippines41 rot/3 ped2Yes30Belgium64 to 5AbroadNo30Egypt61 rot/3 ped2Yes28Chile732Yes27Columbia632No26Korea651 or 2Yes25IndonesiaYes35Switzerland633Yes18Israel54.52.5d6 Months dialysis training required.Yes18Norway65NoNo13Hungary652Yes12Hong Kong573No15rot, Rotating years.Data are given as years unless otherwise noted.a 3 Years for DM degree.b 1 Year pediatrics included in fellowship.c 7 Years medical school if cannot pass English.d 6 Months dialysis training required. Open table in a new tab rot, Rotating years. Data are given as years unless otherwise noted. The AAP survey was sent to 766 pediatric nephrologists. The response rate for the question whether a 2-year fellowship option is wise was 59%, with 49% of respondents in favor, 34% opposed, and 17% unsure. There were 176 free text comments, indicating intense interest in this controversy. Prominent themes (Table 2) in support of a 2-year fellowship were a perceived need for more clinicians, attracting potential clinical trainees, and limiting the financial and time burdens of the third year of training.6Rochlin J.M. Simon H.K. Does fellowship pay? What is the long-term financial impact of subspecialty training in pediatrics?.Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 254-260Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar Themes opposed to the change include the need for research training to understand progress, need for research in understanding and treating disease, and worries about possible development of a 2-tier system. Some commented that a clinical pediatric nephrologist can be trained in 12 to 15 months, whereas others commented that 3 years is not long enough because of the rarity of many of the conditions treated. Of the 102 self-identified pediatric nephrology program directors, 59 thought that a 2-year track was a wise option, 36 were opposed and 7 were undecided.Table 2Pros and cons of a 2-year fellowship in pediatric nephrologyIn favor of 2-year trainingOpposed to 2-year trainingConcentrated clinical training, allowing more skilled cliniciansNot enough time to learn all the skills requiredResearch opportunities have all but dried up for cliniciansPoor financial support for researchResearch training is valuable for academic research career and informs and enhances experience as a clinicianWill slow or even halt pediatric research findingsMake the specialty more attractive, since we need more pediatric nephrologistsPediatric academic status will diminish2 Years would be sufficientTreated as inferior to the 3-year academic nephrologistResearch is essential, and third year expands critical thinking and clinical and research tools of the traineeNot everyone wants to have an academic research careerPediatric academic status will diminishThe strength of Pediatric Nephrology lies in its academic focusEnter the workforce sooner and less expense to the traineeCompensation is the issue not the length of training Open table in a new tab Training requirements for pediatric nephrologists differ from country to country, but 3 years post pediatric training is most common. Variation in prequalification requirements for nephrology training is often based on the amount of education before commencing medical school or general pediatric training. The ABP Nephrology has mandated a 3-year training period for certification since the 1970s in a program approved by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME).7American Board of Pediatrics. Pediatric Nephrology Certification. 2015. Available at: https://www.abp.org/content/pediatric-nephrology-certification. Accessed January 6, 2016.Google Scholar, 8ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Pediatric Nephrology. 2013. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/2013-PR-FAQ-PIF/328_nephrology_peds_07012013.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2016.Google Scholar The trainee must develop competence in all aspects of clinical pediatric nephrology and, since 2004, meet the criteria in “Principles Regarding the Assessment of Scholarly Activity.”9American Board of Pediatrics. 2008. Scholarly activity. Available at: https://www.abp.org/content/scholarly-activity. Accessed January 6, 2016.Google Scholar Under the auspices of the ESPN, most European countries are in the process of adopting uniform minimal standards for pediatric nephrology training of 3 years, with at least the equivalent of one-half day per week devoted to research training.4Recommendations for training of European pediatric nephrologists by the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology. 2105. Available at: http://espn-online.org/training_doc.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2016.Google Scholar The United Kingdom has a well-defined pediatric nephrology training structure with carefully monitored progression of the trainee.10Reid C. An overview of pediatric nephrology activity in the UK. 2015. Available at: http://www.ipna-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/ipna_currents_vol2_issue4.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2016.Google Scholar, 11Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2015. Curriculum for paediatric training: Paediatric nephrology. Available at: http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/system/files/protected/page/August%202015%20Paediatric%20Nephrology%20Curriculum.pdf. Accessed February 17, 2016.Google Scholar The availability of training positions is correlated with estimated workforce needs through the National Training Numbers (NTN) Grid Scheme of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH).12Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2015. NTN Grid programme information. Available at: http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/ntngrid. Accessed February 27, 2016.Google Scholar The fully trained pediatric nephrology consultants are supplemented by Pediatricians with a Special Interest in Nephrology (SPINs).13Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2016. SPIN modules. Available at: http://www.rcpch.ac.uk/training-examinations-professional-development/specialty-recruitment/special-interest-modules/traine. Accessed February 27, 2016.Google Scholar In India, nephrology training can vary from 3 months to 3 years, with the latter required for certification with a DM degree. In India, a medical school graduate receives a Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery degree (MBBS) upon completion of medical school, an MD degree upon completion of specialty training such as general pediatrics, and a DM degree after completion of subspecialty training. The duration and intensity of training varies with the nephrology responsibilities that the trainees are anticipated to assume. Australia and New Zealand guidelines require 3 years of pediatric nephrology training, including 3 months of developmental and psychosocial training.5ANZSN. Advanced training in nephrology: 2015 requirements handbook. 2015. Available at: https://www.racp.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/nephrology-at-hb-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed February 24, 2016.Google Scholar Several respondents commented that because obtaining a consultant pediatric nephrology position in this region is very competitive, prospective pediatric nephrologists often need additional advanced degree(s) in addition to completing nephrology training and certification. In the United States and Canada, concerns exist about workforce adequacy.1Glenn D. Ocegueda S. Nazareth M. et al.The Global Pediatric Nephrology Workforce: A Survey of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association.BMC Nephrol. 2016; 17: 83Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 14Eddy A. An overview of pediatric nephrology in Canada. 2015. Available at: http://www.ipna-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/ipna_currents_vol2_issue3.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2015.Google Scholar, 15Ferris M. Iglesia E. Ko Z. et al.Wanted Pediatric Nephrologists!—Why trainees are not choosing pediatric nephrology.Renal Failure. 2014; 36: 40-44Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar, 16Parker M.G. Ibrahim T. Shaffer R. et al.The future nephrology workforce: will there be one?.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 6: 1501-1506Crossref PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar In 2015, only 30% of pediatric nephrology fellowship positions were filled in the National Residency Matching Program (NRMP), which improved slightly to 44% in the 2016 match.17National Resident Matching Program. Results and Data: Specialties Matching Service, 2016 Appointment Year. National Resident Matching Program. Washington, DC; 2016.Google Scholar Pediatric nephrology recruitment compares unfavorably to other pediatric subspecialties, with only child abuse having a lower percentage of positions filled in 2016. Both adult and pediatric nephrology in the United States are having difficulty attracting qualified applicants, with the number of applicants per adult nephrology fellowship position between 2012 and 2016 dropping from 1.1 applicants per position to 0.6 and in pediatric nephrology from 0.7 to 0.5.17National Resident Matching Program. Results and Data: Specialties Matching Service, 2016 Appointment Year. National Resident Matching Program. Washington, DC; 2016.Google Scholar This disturbing trend suggests that factors other than length of training discourage young physicians from choosing nephrology.1Glenn D. Ocegueda S. Nazareth M. et al.The Global Pediatric Nephrology Workforce: A Survey of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association.BMC Nephrol. 2016; 17: 83Crossref Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 6Rochlin J.M. Simon H.K. Does fellowship pay? What is the long-term financial impact of subspecialty training in pediatrics?.Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 254-260Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar, 15Ferris M. Iglesia E. Ko Z. et al.Wanted Pediatric Nephrologists!—Why trainees are not choosing pediatric nephrology.Renal Failure. 2014; 36: 40-44Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar E-mail contacts sometimes provided conflicting data on pediatric or pediatric nephrology training requirements, creating a potential limitation on the accuracy of the data presented. In part, this may be due to the recent changes in recommendations for pediatric nephrology training discussed above. In an effort to obtain the most authoritative data, IPNA councilors and committee members were preferentially queried. In conclusion, after completion of general pediatric training, 3 years is the most common duration of pediatric nephrology fellowship and recently has become the new minimal recommendation in Europe, Australia, and New Zealand. Some countries with centralized medical systems, such as the United Kingdom, base the number of training positions available upon projected workforce needs. In other IPNA countries, variation in the duration of pediatric nephrology training relates to anticipated clinical expectations. Because of concerns about a potentially inadequate workforce, many North American pediatric nephrologists wonder if a 2-year clinical track should be considered. All the authors declared no competing of interests. The authors thank all the IPNA members who graciously answered the e-mail query; Larry Greenbaum, MD, Suzanne Kirkwood, Holly Ruch-Ross, PhD, and Carrie Radabaugh, who worked on the AAP survey; Phuong (Julia) Le, who helped analyze the free text comments; and Keia Sanderson, MD, for her critiques of the manuscript. Download .pdf (.17 MB) Help with pdf files 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics nephrology workforce survey.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.