MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2490545805 · doi:10.2118/03-09-ge1

Health, Safety, and Environment Management and ISO 14001 in Shell Canada: Addressing Increasing Public Expectations in Exploration, Development, and Operations

2003· article· en· W2490545805 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Tasman P. Crowe, J. Cussin, L. Calder

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Canadian Petroleum Technology · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensShell (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransparency (behavior)Sustainable developmentBusinessWork (physics)Petroleum industryEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningEngineeringEconomicsPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background Society's expectations of big corporations are changing. These expectations include The need for safe places to live and work, a healthy environment environmental protection, conservation of biodiversity, clean air and water, and a reasonable rate of return on investment. Public confidence in large corporations is at a low ebb. Companies must do more than tell people what they are doing to meet these expectations. They must show them. In the past decade, then.. have been many issues that the oil and gas industry has needed to address such as flaring, c1imale change, land use and the creation of access, and water usage and availability. Stakeholders of all types are demanding increased engagement and participation in the decision-making process at the exploration. Development, and operation stage. The implications for the oil and gas industry are critical. Continuing to have access to explore and develop hydrocarbon resources is becoming a major issue for the industry. Shell Canada is striving to meet these changing expectations. In 1990. Shell adopted a formal policy and management system on sustainable development. Since then it has been working to integrate the economic, environmental, and social considerations of sustainable development into the Company's day-To-day business activities. In recent years, the most powerful addition to Shell's understanding of sustainable development has been the identifications of the need for transparency in the Company's policies, plans., and performance. To address these changing expectations in 2000 Shell began revising its system for environmental management in order to register to the international standard ISO 14001. As an initial step towards registration, ISO 14001 requires companies to identify the environmental interactions of their operations called environmental aspects. The ISO 14001 Standard requires that an organization must know and uderstand its interactions with the environment and must have a system in place to effectively control and manage this interaction. The management of Shell's environmental aspects is controlled Through its Environmental Management System (EMS). This EMS provides a structured framework to effectively manage environmental risks and issues and provide a process to initiate improvement. Shell's EMS is embedded in its broader Health, Safety and Environment Management System (HSE MS). In 2000 and 2001, Shell successfully registered the EMS of its operating activities and major business functions to the ISO 14001 standard. What is ISO 14001 and Why Register? ISO 14001 registration is one way to demonstrate transparency and accountability to stakeholders. ISO 14001 is an internationally recognized environmental management standard that is used by organizations across the world. Registering to ISO 14001 required that an outside independent body (Registrar) audit Shell's environmental management system initially, and then continuously. The external audit by an outside body is an important element to demonstrate transparency and accountability. The ISO 14001 Standard defines a minimum set of requirements for environmental management that an organization must have effectively implemented to achieve registration. The systematic approach structure and discipline that an ISO 14001 management system creates helps companies focus on continually improving their environmental performance.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,836
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,969

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,209 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2003
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Canadian Petroleum TechnologyMême sujetReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsTravaux en français237 207