MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2490755617 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.4227.4227

Phase 1/1b Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Safety Study of the Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Patients (Pts) with Severe Renal Impairment or End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Requiring Hemodialysis

2015· article· en· W2490755617 sur OpenAlexaff
Neeraj Gupta, Michael J. Hanley, R. Donald Harvey, Ashraf Badros, Brea Lipe, Vishal Kukreti, Jesús G. Berdeja, Huyuan Yang, Ai‐Min Hui, Xiaoquan Zhang, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Ajai Chari

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIxazomibMedicineUrologyHemodialysisPharmacokineticsDosingCmaxMultiple myelomaDialysisRenal functionPharmacologyInternal medicinePharmacodynamicsEnd stage renal diseaseSurgeryProteasome inhibitorCarfilzomib

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Renal impairment (RI) is a major complication of MM. The oral PI ixazomib is currently under phase 3 investigation in MM. PK data from pts with mild or moderate RI (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥30 mL/min) suggest no ixazomib dose modification is needed in these pts (Gupta et al BJCP 2015). Hence, this study (NCT01830816) aimed to characterize the PK of ixazomib in pts with severe RI or ESRD requiring hemodialysis to provide posology recommendations in these pt populations. Methods Pts with RRMM or advanced malignant solid tumors were enrolled in the normal (N, CrCl ≥90 mL/min), severe (S, CrCl<30 mL/min) and ESRD requiring hemodialysis groups. CrCl was calculated using two blood samples according to the Cockcroft-Gault method. Pts received a single dose of ixazomib 3 mg. Blood samples were collected after the single dose, at multiple time points over 15 days, to characterize the plasma PK of ixazomib. For ESRD pts, pre- and post-dialyzer plasma samples were also collected hourly during the first 4-hour dialysis session 24−28 hrs after dosing. An additional pre-dose blood sample was collected for in vitro estimation of ixazomib plasma protein binding. After completion of PK sampling, pts could continue to receive ixazomib (at the higher dose of 4 mg if 3 mg was well tolerated) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles (part B of the study). Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of unbound PK parameters in the RI groups vs the normal group were calculated using an ANOVA model. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed using NCI CTCAE version 4.03. Results 41 pts were enrolled (20, 14, and 7 to the N, S, and ESRD groups); 61% female, and 66% Caucasian and 29% African American. Mean age was 61.7 years (range 40-82) and mean weight was 83.3 kg (range 46-147). 37 pts had RRMM, and 4 had advanced solid tumors (2 colon, 1 liver, 1 thyroid). 38 pts had reportable PK parameters (Cmax or AUC) and were PK-evaluable (18 N, 14 S, 6 ESRD) (Table). Following a 3 mg dose, ixazomib was rapidly absorbed in all 3 renal function groups, with a median Tmaxof 1.0 to 1.25 hours. Ixazomib was highly bound to plasma proteins with a similar mean fraction bound of approximately 99% in all 3 renal function groups. Unbound systemic exposures (AUC) of ixazomib were 38% higher in pts with severe RI or ESRD. PK profiles were similar in solid tumor and MM pts. Ixazomib concentrations were similar in pre- and post-dialyzer samples collected hourly from ESRD pts during the 4-hour hemodialysis. In the safety population (N=41), most pts (95%) experienced at least 1 AE; the most common were diarrhea (37%), nausea (32%), fatigue (29%), vomiting (29%), and anemia (20%). The incidence of these AEs was generally similar among renal function groups with the exception of anemia, which was more common in patients in the S and ESRD groups (5%, 36%, and 29% in the N, S, and ESRD groups, respectively). Although the incidences of the most common AEs were generally similar among renal function groups, the incidences of grade 3/4 AEs and serious AEs were greater in the S and ESRD groups versus the N group (79% and 43% vs 35%, and 43% and 57% vs 10%, respectively). In part B of the study, AEs resulting in dose reductions and discontinuations were more common in the S versus N groups (36% vs 25%, and 29% vs 10%, respectively); no pt had an AE leading to dose reduction or discontinuation in the ESRD groups. Relative ixazomib dose intensities were 93.8%, 79.6%, and 61.6% in the N, S, and ESRD groups. There were 3 on-study deaths (2 in the S group and one in the ESRD group). One MM pt in the S group died due to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure considered related to study treatment. Conclusions Compared with pts with normal renal function,unbound systemic exposures of ixazomib were 38% higher in pts with severe RI or ESRD requiring dialysis. Therefore, a reduced starting dose of 3 mg is recommended for pts with severe RI or ESRD requiring dialysis. Ixazomib is not dialyzable and can be administered without regards to the timing of dialysis. Table 1. Renal Function Group Geometric mean (%CV) PK Parameters Severe RI or ESRD vs Normal Least-squares Geometric Mean Ratio (90% CI) Unbound Cmax(ng/mL) Unbound AUC (ng.hr/mL) Unbound Cmax Unbound AUC Normal (n=18) 0.30 (66) 6.64 (61) N/A N/A Severe RI (n=14) 0.478 (86) 9.25 (55) 1.60 (0.99-2.58) 1.39 (0.88-2.20) ESRD (n=6) 0.213 (57) 8.93 (55) 0.71 (0.38-1.34) 1.34 (0.78-2.31) Severe RI/ ESRD (Combined) (n=20) 0.375 (98) 9.13 (54) 1.25 (0.79-1.98) 1.38 (0.93-2.04) Disclosures Gupta: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Off Label Use: Investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib. Hanley:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Harvey:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kukreti:Lundbeck: Honoraria; Ortho: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Berdeja:Abbvie: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Array: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding. Yang:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Hui:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Zhang:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Venkatakrishnan:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Chari:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Biotest: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array Biopharma: Consultancy, Other: Institutional Research Funding, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207