MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2494722392 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.248.248

Higher Incidence of Treatment-Related Toxicities in Non-Hispanic Patients Undergoing Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ALL Consortium Protocol 05-001

2015· article· en· W2494722392 sur OpenAlexaff
Justine M. Kahn, Sergio Barrera, Randy Davila, Emily Roberts, Zhezhen Jin, Kristen E. Stevenson, Traci M. Blonquist, Donna Neuberg, Uma H. Athale, Luis A. Clavell, Peter D. Cole, Caroline Laverdière, Bruno Michon, Marshall A. Schorin, Jennifer Welch, Stephen E. Sallan, Lewis B. Silverman, Kara M. Kelly

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Établissements canadiensCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineHamilton Health SciencesCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité de MontréalMcMaster Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineIncidence (geometry)PrednisoneExact testInternal medicinePediatric cancerPediatricsCumulative incidenceRetrospective cohort studyAsparaginaseCohortCancerSurgeryLeukemiaLymphoblastic Leukemia

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Risk-adapted treatment strategies have contributed to excellent outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); however, treatment-associated acute and long-term toxicities persist. Therapy-associated toxicities of note in pediatric ALL are related to a treatment backbone that relies heavily on corticosteroids (prednisone and dexamethasone) and asparaginase (ASP). The most frequently observed toxicities include, but are not limited to, serious infection, pancreatitis, thrombosis and bony morbidities including osteonecrosis (ON) and fracture. Previous studies suggest that children of racial and ethnic minorities are at higher risk for treatment-associated toxicities. We assessed the incidence of treatment-related toxicities in Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients undergoing treatment for pediatric ALL. Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort study investigating the incidence of treatment-related toxicities including infection, allergy to ASP, pancreatitis, thrombosis and bony morbidities in Hispanic and non-Hispanic children and adolescents with newly diagnosed ALL undergoing therapy on Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) ALL Consortium Protocol 05-001. The ethnicity of each patient was designated at the time of study enrollment by research coordinators. Descriptive statistics were calculated, mean +/- SD for continuous variables and frequency and percentages for categorical variables. Toxicity rates were based on number of patients. Comparison between groups was done by Chi-square test or FisherÕs exact test and p -value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Between 2005 and 2011, 794 children and adolescents (ages 1 - 18 years) were enrolled on Protocol 05-001, 730 of whom were evaluable for this investigation: 150 Hispanic (18%), 580 non-Hispanic (73%). Sixty-four patients did not have ethnicity documented. There was no significant difference in disease-risk group, age or gender between the two groups. Weight was significantly higher in Hispanic patients (31.9 ± 24.4 kg in Hispanic and 26.9 ± 18.7 kg in non-Hispanic, p = 0.021). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ASP-related toxicities (allergy, pancreatitis, thrombosis) between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of infection between the two groups (42% in Hispanic and 50% in non-Hispanic, p = 0.081). Non-Hispanic patients had significantly higher rates of opportunistic infection (Pneumocystis pneumonia) than Hispanic patients (0.7% in Hispanic and 4% in non-Hispanic, p = 0.041). A similar difference in the incidence of bacteremia between the two groups approached, but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.052). The overall incidence of fracture in all patients was 14.5% and was significantly higher in non-Hispanic patients (6% in Hispanic and 16.7% in non-Hispanic, p < 0.001). The overall incidence of ON was 8.9% and was significantly higher in non-Hispanic patients (3.3% in Hispanic and 10.3% in non-Hispanic, p = 0.007). (Table 1) Conclusion: The incidence of opportunistic infections and bony morbidities was significantly higher in non-Hispanic patients undergoing treatment for pediatric ALL on the DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 05-001. The risk for, and impact of therapy-related toxicities varies by a patientÕs treatment tolerance, perhaps as a function of age and gender or as a result of disease biology or genetic polymorphisms affecting drug metabolism. Additionally, non-biologic factors such as medication adherence and nutritional status may also contribute to toxicity incidence in patients undergoing treatment for pediatric ALL. Prospective studies to further investigate our findings are warranted. Table. All Patients, (N = 730) Non-Hispanic, (N = 580) Hispanic, (N = 150) p -value Overall Infection 353/730 (48.4%) 290/580 (50%) 63/150 (42%) 0.081 Bacteremia 289/730 (39.6%) 240/580 (41.4%) 49/150 (9.3%) 0.052 Opportunistic Infection 24/730 (3.3%) 23/580 (4%) 1/150 (0.7%) 0.041 Fracture 106/730 (14.5%) 97/580 (16.7%) 9/150 (6%) <0.001 Osteonecrosis 65/730 (8.9%) 60/580 (10.3%) 5/150 (3.3%) 0.007 Thrombosis* 36/730 (4.9%) 26/580 (4.5%) 10/150 (6.7%) 0.271 Pancreatitis* 78/730 (10.7%) 60/580 (10.3%) 18/150 (12%) 0.559 ASP Allergy* 76/730 (10.4%) 57/580 (9.8%) 19/150 (12.7%) 0.310 *ASP-related toxicity Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,692
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,318
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations9
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchTravaux en français237 207