MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2496245877 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.117.117

A Phase 1 Study of the BET-Bromodomain Inhibitor OTX015 in Patients with Advanced Acute Leukemia

2014· article· en· W2496245877 sur OpenAlexaff
Hervé Dombret, Claude Preudhomme, Céline Berthon, Emmanuel Raffoux, Xavier Thomas, Norbert Vey, Carlos Gomez‐Roca, Mark Ethell, Karen Yee, Fabrice Bourdel, Patrice Herait, Mauricette Michallet, Christian Récher, Christophe Roumier, Bruno Quesnel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBromodomainMedicineLeukemiaMinimal residual diseaseInternal medicineBone marrowOncologyPharmacologyEpigeneticsBiologyGeneGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: BET-bromodomain (BRD) proteins play a major role in the epigenetic regulation of gene transcription, notably of genes with superenhancer promoter regions including many oncogenes, such as MYC. OTX015 is a specific BRD 2, 3 and 4 inhibitor that blocks oncogene transcription, and triggers growth inhibition and apoptosis in acute leukemia cell lines and patient cells in vitro (Braun et al. ASH Annual Meeting 2013). Based on these findings, a Phase 1 study of OTX015 was designed for patients with advanced acute leukemia. Patients & Methods: Patients with various unselected relapsed/refractory leukemia subtypes for which no standard therapy options were available were enrolled in this ongoing Phase 1 study. Patients aged < 60 years had to have failed at least two lines of therapy and those aged >60 years at least one line. At least 5% bone marrow leukemic blasts were required at study entry. OTX015 was given orally, daily for 14 days of 21-day cycles (cy). The dose was escalated from 10 to 160 mg daily (QD) according to a standard 3+3 dose-escalation design, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or biologically optimal dose. A BID schedule was tested at dose level (DL) 4 (40 mg x 2) and a continuous schedule at 120 mg. Pharmacokinetics was studied on day 1 and residual concentrations were measured on days 2, 8 and 15. Responses were assessed on blood and bone marrow aspirations at baseline, days 8, 22 and 43. Blasts at baseline and day 8 were stored for pharmacodynamic biomarker evaluation. Cytogenetic and molecular markers were collected based on center practice. Results: From January 2013 to June 2014, 36 patients were treated over 6 dose levels: 33 with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 2 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 1 with refractory anemia with excess blasts. Median age was 70 years (range 19-85), 20 patients were male, 29 patients had ECOG 0-1, and 16 AML patients had normal karyotype. Patients had a median of 2 prior therapy lines (range 1-4). The median number of OTX015 cycles administered was 2 (range 1-14+), including 9 patients with >3 cycles. Among the 28 patients evaluable for dose limiting toxicity (DLT), no DLTs were observed through DL5 (120 mg QD). The MTD was exceeded at DL6 (160 mg QD) with one patient experiencing grade 3 diarrhea and another grade 3 fatigue and anorexia. The main toxicities were non-cumulative grade 1-2 gastrointestinal events (6 patients diarrhea, 3 dysgueusia, 3 abdominal pain, 3 nausea, 1 anorexia), hyperglycemia (3 patients), coagulation factor VII decrease (6 patients) and direct bilirubin increase (3 patients) (two latter AEs asymptomatic). These toxicities were mainly observed at QD doses above 80 mg and with 40 mg BID. Dose proportional plasma concentrations were observed and trough concentrations > 500 nM (in vitro active concentrations) were regularly observed from 80 mg/day. Clinically relevant activity was reported in 5 AML patients treated at 10, 40 and 80 mg, including one sustained CR from cy 4 to cy 12 (40 mg QD) and one CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp) from cy 2 to cy 5 (80 mg QD). Two patients (10 mg QD, 40 mg QD) had partial blast clearance (disappearance of peripheral blasts and decrease >50% in bone marrow blast percentage) and the remaining patient (40 mg BID) had gum hypertrophy resolution. Four of these 5 patients had secondary or therapy-related AML, 4 had normal karyotype and 2 had an NPM1 gene mutation. Conclusions: OTX015 single agent exhibits antileukemic activity over a wide range of DLs and plasma concentrations in patients with advanced AML. MTD is exceeded at 160 mg QD. The safe recommended dose and schedule is close to being identified. Central extensive molecular marker analysis is being performed and will be prospectively implemented in an expansion cohort. Updated data will be presented and will include correlations between regimen, pharmacokinetics, clinical activity and molecular profile. Table Dose (Schedule) N pts evaluable Evidence of activity DLT 10 QD (14/21) 3 1 20 QD (14/21) 3 40 QD(14/21) 4 1 (CR) 80 QD(14/21) 3 2 (1 CRp) 40 BID (14/21) 6 1 120 QD (14/21) 3 120 QD (21/21) 3 160 QD (14/21) 3 Diarrhea (1) Anorexia/fatigue (1) Disclosures Dombret: Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Preudhomme:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Berthon:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Raffoux:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Thomas:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Vey:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Gomez-Roca:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Ethell:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Yee:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Bourdel:Oncoethix SA: Employee of study CRO Other. Herait:Oncoethix SA: CMO and Shareholder Other. Michallet:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Recher:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Roumier:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding. Quesnel:Oncoethix SA: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,240
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,270

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations39
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetProtein Degradation and InhibitorsTravaux en français237 207