Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The breeding biology of black ducks (Anas rubripes) was studied in an estuarine habitat over the period 1963-73. Nests were located on islands and on the mainland in the vicinity of tidal marshes. Of 590 nests, 248 (42 percent) reached the hatching stage; the mainland-nesting portion of the popu- lation showed a nest success of 28 percent (N = 83 nests), those using the main nesting island, Ile- aux-Pommes, 44 percent (N = 478 nests), and those using other islands 52 percent (N = 29 nests). On Ile-aux-Pommes annual nest success varied between 30 and 71 percent. Unsuccessful clutches were lost to predation (mainly gull (Larus sp.) and crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) on islands, red fox (Vulpes fulva) and crow on mainland) or desertion. Fifty-two nests (9 percent of total) were judged to have been abandoned as a direct result of disturbance by the investigator. Annual fluctuations in nesting success could not be clearly attributed to weather factors, the quantity or quality of concealing cover, or to predator or competitor density. Nesting success did not vary according to laying date, but did vary in relation to the stage of nesting; the probability of loss was much greater during egg-laying than during incubation. Through renesting, nest losses were compensated for in some years but not in others. On the average, 65 percent of island nesting pairs brought off broods. Using capture-recapture tech- niques and visual observation, I estimated that 55 percent of all broods produced flying young, and 34 percent of ducklings that hatched reached flight age. On the basis of these estimates, 100 breeding pairs would produce 183 fledged young, a rate much lower than reported for this species in other studies; the discrepancy of results is attributed mainly to losses of entire broods which were unaccounted for in other studies. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 39(2):243-255 To manage animal populations with the aim of assuring a harvestable surplus, knowledge of the species' reproductive out- put (rate of production of fledged young) is essential. Attempts to modify waterfowl habitat to favor increased production of young should be aimed at minimizing the effects of those factors which cause most prefledge losses. Detailed knowledge of the stages at which losses occur and the circumstances in which they occur should form the basis for attempts to preserve or modify habitat and to manipulate predator or competitor populations. Both nesting and brood-rearing phases of the breeding cycle must be considered. This paper, based on the results of 11 years' study of the black duck in the St. Lawrence estuary, Quebec, attempts to evaluate the rate of production of fledged young per nesting female. Intensive hunting of the relatively small population of black ducks in eastern North
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».