An Online Course in Critical Mental Health Promotion: Teaching and Learning at Multiple Spheres of Influence
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Supportive environments contribute to the mental health of individuals, local and global communities. Ways of thinking “critically” about what we know and ways of accomplishing mental health promotion work have a more contested history however. A critical perspective demands subjective awareness, and an openness to view the world from multiple perspectives. As such, a collaborative, international, and fully on-line course was developed between post-secondary educational institutions in Norway and Canada. This course intends to meet a need for critical awareness and understanding of the connect ion of diverse perspectives and environments to mental health promotion practices in the field. Purpose: Our study, of the development and implementation of an innovative critical mental health promotion course, was oriented around the following key questions: How is capacity for critical mental health promotion awareness developed through an on-line international learning environment? And how can supportive learning environments reshape mental health support across international borders? Our goal was to explore the work of students and faculty with the tensions that dominate current mental health promotion. This course began from the diverse locations, experiences and approaches of our students as important sites of critical exploration. Through the virtual world of electronic learning activities, students entered this diversity of worlds, and debated over the shape of health and mental health as notions themselves, as well as over the approaches that best produce support. Most importantly, students debated over the distribution of po wer, justice, and social and economic advantage held within mental health and various approaches to promoting mental health. Method: The overall approach was based on action research using collaborative enquiry of the case study of our pilot course offering. The enquiry was conducted over 3 years of course development and pilot course delivery. Results: Ultimately, through our reflection and study of the critical learning approaches in action, we were able to explore what supportive environments for mental health are and what particular approaches “do” locally and globally. Further we were able to reorient mental health promotion work through network building in ways that may potentially change nursing practice. Conclusions: The results and lessons learned, from development to implementation of an on-line collaborative international mental health promotion course, expanded the capacities of nursing programs, educational institutions, faculty and students, and expanded what can be known about supportive environments for mental health. © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,034 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».