MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W250122316

New Rules for Expats: Leaving America with Dignity

2005· article· en· W250122316 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Lifson, Peter E. Bentley

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueTaxation and Legal Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTax reformEconomicsLaw and economicsIncome taxPopulationSubject (documents)BusinessPolitical sciencePublic economicsSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Congress has debated the merits of various tax measures for expatriates for more than 20 years. The most straightforward approach is an exit tax on all untaxed asset appreciation on departure. Fortunately, this complex tax policy has been constrained by civil rights concerns of those who view exit taxes as inappropriate barriers to free population movement, historically used by totalitarian-style regimes to detain their oppressed inhabitants. In spite of this controversy, several enlightened governments, notably Canada and Australia, have recently adopted this approach, with mixed results. The United States uses another approach ... for now. The world is going global, and the U.S. tax system is keeping up with the times. The American Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) established special rules for individuals emigrating from the United States, including all traditional expatriates--people giving up citizenship--and even certain aliens relinquishing permanent residency. They subject the wealthy to at least 10 years of stricter reporting, and monitor and tax certain post-departure income. The less-wealthy are allowed to leave with minimal fuss, but must report their departure to claim U.S. tax freedom. The U.S. tax system is unique in its global approach to taxation. U.S. citizens always are required to pay income tax on their worldwide income from all sources, subject to various credits, exemptions and exceptions, and any gifts they make or estates they leave are generally subject to U.S. transfer taxes. Enhanced disclosure requirements, an intent-driven tax regime and the inclusion of long-term residents in the anti-avoidance regime tightened these rules in 1996. The chink in the armor in the 1996 revisions was the focus on the taxpayer's intent to trigger the full antiavoidance tax system. Determining intent has proven nearly as costly and elusive as the daunting task of determining the fair value of unsold assets at departure. NEW LEGISLATION, NEW RULES The new rules apply to all departing expatriates retroactively from June 3, 2004. In addition to the 10-year postexpatriation self-assessment and reporting system, the net-worth threshold also has been increased, exempting more of the less-than-wealthy from continuing tax payment and return filing obligations. This will allow those individuals to move freely with no special postdeparture U.S. taxes or reporting responsibilities after an initial filing. Expensive and time-consuming letter ruling requests no longer are required. When citizens (or long-term residents) move to locations where there is a U.S. tax treaty, those provisions also must be considered in determining the individual's U.S. tax reporting obligations. An expatriate continues to be a U.S. resident for tax purposes, and liable for U.S. tax on worldwide income, until the formal acts of expatriation and associated reporting are complete. Under the new law, all citizens and long-term residents remain U.S. residents until the later of the day they perform an expatriating act (give up citizenship or green card status) or file an information return with the IRS documenting their expatriation and financial status. FITTING INTO THE TAX SYSTEM The United States taxes noncitizens (aliens) based on their U.S. activities. If an alien's presence in the United States is casual, only U.S. source income is taxable and transfer taxes (on estates and gifts) apply only to specific classes of U.S. assets. The tax profile of aliens changes significantly when they become U.S. residents. For income tax purposes, this is objectively based on immigration status (the green card test for those that obtain lawful permanent residence) or physical presence (the substantial presence test). For estate and gift tax purposes, residence is based on domicile. An alien who becomes a resident is subject to the same income tax rules as any U.S. citizen. Most resident aliens can change their residence status freely, leaving the United States at will, with few U. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,574
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,010
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,266
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancyMême sujetTaxation and Legal IssuesTravaux en français237 207