Abstract 136: Refining the molecular profile of colorectal tumors to expand prevention and treatment opportunities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The completion of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project for colorectal cancer (CRC) is ushering in a new phase of identifying treatment strategies tailored to the molecular profile of each person's tumor. Precision medicine approaches to cancer treatment rely on the identification of molecular profiles that can be used to identify effective therapies and can be used in a targeted sequencing setting to make treatment decisions. The initial TCGA colorectal effort included 276 samples and focused on integrating data from exome sequencing with genome-wide DNA copy number alterations (CNAs), DNA methylation, and mRNA and microRNA expression. Since then a total of 626 samples have been completed with the potential to refine CRC subtypes, identify novel mutated pathways, and further functional understanding. Such a large data set presents opportunities to identify new recurrent drug targets and to stratify patients into groups that are predictive of treatment response. However, large data sets also present substantial challenges, since hand-curation becomes intractable, while computational tools can be overwhelmed by hypermutation and copy number changes. Here we present a comprehensive molecular analysis of all 626 TCGA colorectal cancer samples, including exome sequencing, CNAs, DNA methylation, and mRNA expression. For each data type, we identified recurrently altered genes. Using MutSigCV on 525 samples yielded 27 and 87 significantly mutated genes in non-hypermutated and hypermutated samples, respectively, a substantial increase over the 15 and 17 somatically recurrently mutated genes identified using MutSig in non-hypermutated and hypermutated samples, respectively, in the previously published TCGA colorectal study. For example, PTEN, a known tumor suppressor, was not reported as significantly recurrently mutated in the initial TCGA non-hypermutated set; however, it was in the larger non-hypermutated set, demonstrating the power of a larger data set for assessing the significance and relative frequency of mutations in the context of known subtypes. In addition, we integrated the somatic mutation data, copy number data, LOH data, and hyper-methylation data to identify genes, like MLH1, that are recurrently disrupted by different mechanisms. We also considered somatic mutations that are likely gain-of-function mutations based on nonrandom clustering; and we used recurrent indels to identify loss-of-function drivers in samples positive for microsatellite instability (MSI). We further classified each sample using the previously identified subtypes – BRAF+, KRAS+, APC+, CTNNB1+ (beta-catenin+), TGFBR2/SMAD4+, PTEN+ and PIK3CA+, and R-spondin fusion positive, as well as CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) and MSI - in order to refine the relevant molecular signatures driving CRC etiology and thereby prevention and treatment paradigms. Citation Format: Catherine S. Grasso, Eve Shinbrot, Ming Yu, Max Liesersen, Mark Chaisson, Andrew Chan, Charles Connolly, James Dai, Margaret Du, Charles Fuchs, Levi Garraway, Marios Giannakis, Tabitha Harrison, Li Hsu, Jeroen Huyghe, Jasmine Mu, Shuji Ogino, Colin Pritchard, Stephen Salipante, Wei Sun, Syed H. Zaidi, Ni Zhao, William Grady, Ben Raphael, Thomas Hudson, David Wheeler, Ulrike Peters. Refining the molecular profile of colorectal tumors to expand prevention and treatment opportunities. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 136.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».