Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Many Canadian children must cope with unduly negative life experiences, such as racial and ethnic prejudice, severe learning and behavior problems, inadequate parenting, family violence, and poverty. These children are vulnerable. They are children whose chances of leading healthy and productive lives are somewhat reduced unless there is a concerted and prolonged effort to intervene on their behalf. In 1994, Human Resources Development Canada, in cooperation with Statistics Canada, launched the National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth (NLSCY), a study of a nationally representative sample of over 20,000 Canadian children and their families. When the NLSCY data became available, I had the opportunity to work with scholars from across Canada in analysing the data to examine several questions concerning childhood vulnerability: How many children in Canada can be considered vulnerable? Where do the majority of them reside? Can we help them meet the difficult challenges they face, thereby significantly improving the quality of their lives? Can we provide avenues for success, so that more children will lead healthy, productive lives? Can we identify schools and local communities that are particularly successful in improving the life chances of vulnerable children, and determine what it is that they are doing differently? We brought the research findings together in an edited volume entitled, Vulnerable Children: Findings from Canada’s National Longitudinal Study of Children and Youth which was published this spring by University of Alberta Press. A difficult task in this work was to define “vulnerable children”. The term “vulnerable” connotes susceptibility – that one is exposed, or liable to experience some undesirable life outcome in the future. Our definition was based on children’s cognitive and behavioural outcomes, rather than on “risk factors” that predict negative life outcomes. A child was considered vulnerable in the cognitive domain if he or she had a low score on a standardized test of motor and social development at ages 0 to 3, a low score on a test of receptive vocabulary at ages 4 and 5, or a low score on a standardized mathematics test at ages 6 to 11. Children were considered vulnerable in Vulnerable children and youth
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle