MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2504451653 · doi:10.1182/blood.v120.21.675.675

Results of the Phase 1 Trial of RG7112, a Small-Molecule MDM2 Antagonist, in Acute Leukemia

2012· article· en· W2504451653 sur OpenAlexaff
Michael Andreeff, Kevin R. Kelly, Karen Yee, Sarit Assouline, Roger Strair, Leslie Popplewell, David Bowen, Giovanni Martinelli, Mark W. Drummond, Paresh Vyas, Mark Kirschbaum, Swaminathan P. Iyer, Kensuke Kojima, David Geho, Steven Blotner, Suzanne Cheng, Lyubomir T. Vassilev, Meichun Ding, Jianguo Zhi, Steven A. Middleton, Gwen Nichols

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer-related Molecular Pathways
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreJewish General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineLeukemiaInternal medicineBone marrowClinical trialImmunologyMdm2OncologyPhases of clinical researchPharmacologyBiologyApoptosisGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 675 Background: Activation of the p53 pathway by inhibition of its negative regulator MDM2 has been proposed as a novel strategy for cancer therapy. We report the final results of the Phase 1 leukemia trial of RG7112, a small molecule antagonist of MDM2 which activates p53 by disrupting the p53-MDM2 interaction. Methods: The trial was designed as a multi-center, open-label Phase 1 MAD study of patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia treated with escalating doses of single agent RG7112 in two strata: A:AML, ALL, CML-BC; and B:CLL and S-CLL. RG7112 was administered orally daily for 10 days followed by 18 days of rest. Primary objectives were to determine MTD and DLT; secondary objectives to assess PK, PD and clinical responses. Enrollment is complete. 4 patients remain on study, and final data is being compiled. Peripheral blood was collected for PK and biomarkers pre-treatment, at multiple time points during the first 48 hours, and on d10. Bone marrow was collected pre-treatment, d10 and d28. Blood and marrow were purified by MACS sorting (CD19, 33 or 34 Ab). AmpliChip analysis of p53 mutational status (single nucleotide alterations exons 2–11) was performed. MIC-1 (macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1), a p53 transcriptional target, was analyzed in serum by ELISA as a pharmacodynamic marker of p53 activation. Baseline MDM2 mRNA levels, and changes from baseline, as a marker of p53 activation and feedback on MDM2, were measured by RT-PCR. A panel of 24 genes was assessed serially by TLDA (q-PCR). Results: 116 patients (84 AML,10 ALL, 2 CML, 20 CLL/sCLL) were treated with RG7112 doses ranging from 20 – 2430 (1215 BID) mg/m2/day × 10 days. The dose-exposure relationship (Cmax, AUC, and Ctrough) was approximately linear with a median half-life of 1–1.5 days. 43 patients with acute leukemia were dosed at the MTD of 1500 mg BID (flat dose) × 10 days. Major adverse events(> 20%) were nausea, diarrhea and vomiting. Other major (>10%) AEs were complications of leukemia (e.g. neutropenic fever). Clinical activity was noted during dose escalation (ASH 2011), including apoptosis in AML and CLL, CR in an AML patient (360mg/m2) stable for 6 cycles (10 months) and one patient with CLL/Richter's transformation with stable disease (40 mg/m2) for >25 cycles. New data focuses on AML patients treated at MTD. This cohort received a median of 3 prior treatments, 16 were refractory to last treatment. 17 (40%) had evidence of hematologic improvement (greater than 50% drop in peripheral and/or BM blasts by d28). Of the 31 patients who completed cycle 1 dosing, 5 patients (16%) had a CR (2 CR, 2 CRi. 1 CR without recovery). Two CR patients have proceeded to allotransplant. All CR patients' blasts were p53wt. Of the 12 additional patients with single-agent hematologic activity, 3 had biochemical evidence of tumor lysis syndrome, 10 had p53status evaluable, and mutations were detected in 3: (exon 7 missense, exon 9 frameshift, intron 7 splice). p53 activation by RG7112 was demonstrated by MIC-1 induction in serum. MIC-1 levels were elevated at RG7112 plasma concentrations >2 μg/mL or AUC24h >50 μg · h/mL and were highly correlated (0.5629) with exposure to RG7112 (AUC24h) at steady state following a sigmoidal Emax model. Preliminary data review suggests a positive correlation between exposure to RG7112 and changes in MDM2 gene expression at day 2. In addition, q-PCR analysis demonstrated exposure-dependent induction of key p53 transcriptional targets including MDM2, p21, and PUMA. p53 protein increase by WB was demonstrated at the MTD in selected patients. These findings are consistent with the proposed mechanism of action of RG7112. Conclusions: We report evidence of single agent clinical activity in patients with leukemia treated with RG7112, including 6 AML patients with CR, 5 of 31 (16%) at the MTD, and additional patients with significant decreases in blasts. Concentration-related pharmacodynamic biomarker activity of the p53 pathway was demonstrated by increases in MIC-1 levels, and induction of p53 target genes including mdm2, p21 and PUMA. 4 patients remain on treatment and final results will be reported. We provide proof of mechanism and evidence for single-agent clinical activity of MDM2 antagonism in leukemia by demonstrating complete remission, lysis of leukemic blasts and activation of p53 pathway targets in leukemic cells from patients treated with RG7112. Clinical studies of RG7112 in combination are underway. Disclosures: Andreeff: Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Unrestricted gift, Unrestricted gift Other. Yee:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Assouline:Roche: travel funding Other. Martinelli:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Drummond:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Geho:Roche: Employment. Blotner:Roche: Employment. Cheng:Roche: Employment. Vassilev:Roche: Employment. Ding:Roche: Employment. Zhi:Roche: Employment. Middleton:Roche: Employment. Nichols:Roche: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,189
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,404

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,263 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations20
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCancer-related Molecular PathwaysTravaux en français237 207