Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Some species are so social that it is impossible to say that any two or three individuals are closer psychically than any others. The family group is together all the time – togetherness that would drive most people mad. The three species represented here are the elephant, orca, and naked mole-rat. Other species have groups whose closeness depends upon their environment – if the area is densely populated with animals of the same species, then mature youngsters will not be able to start reproducing for themselves, but may stay with their natal family, helping to raise the next year’s young. Examples are wolves, coyotes, beaver, crows, and gibbons. The final five species discussed, woolly spider monkeys, black-handed spider monkeys, lesser kudu, white rhinoceros, and sperm whales, form friendly groups for reasons that require further study. Elephants Are there preferred dyads, triads, foursomes, or any other combination of individuals present in maternal elephant troops? There is no way to tell. A herd of adult female elephants ( Loxodonta africana ) and their young (the males go their separate ways when they reach adolescence) is so tight that infants, nieces, mothers, aunts, grandmothers, and great-grandmothers are never really separated during their entire, long lives. Cynthia Moss, in her book Elephant Memories (1988), which she wrote after researching the social behavior of elephants in Amboseli National Park for 20 years, notes that all females and young live in such family units. Individuals coordinate their activities so that they are doing the same thing at the same time. If they are traveling, wallowing, resting, or standing, they tend to bunch closely together; they are immensely tactile, often touching each other with their trunks, or leaning and rubbing against one another. (What a nightmare this scenario would be for humans who value their independence!) If, during migration, a baby cannot keep up with the others, the adults slow down as they move forward; if an old female is sick or dying, they gather around her as if offering silent sympathy. When members of a herd have been feeding for a few hours somewhat apart, they salute each other fervently when they again join forces, raising their heads, spreading and flapping their ears, tucking in their chins, and rumbling loud and throatily. If herd members have been separated for a few days, their greetings are even more vehement. They may “spin around urinating and defecating and, with their heads and ears high, fill the air with a deafening cacophony of rumbles, trumpets, roars, and screams” (Poole, 1996). The intensity of the ceremony reflects the degree of their attachment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,035 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».