Relating Lead Hip Internal Rotation During The Golf Swing To Passive Capacity For Joint Movement
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research has suggested that limited hip range of motion (ROM) may contribute to the reporting of low back pain (LBP) among golfers. Particular attention has been paid to the lead hip ROM (i.e. left hip for a right handed golfer), as a large amount of hip internal rotation (IR) is required to complete the golf swing. PURPOSE: To determine if a relationship exists between a golfer’s maximal passive hip IR ROM, and the amount of IR that occurs during the golf swing. METHODS: Ten pain-free male golfers with a current playing handicap of less than 5 were recruited (age = 29.6±5.6 years, height = 1.81±0.05 m, mass = 86.1±13.9 kg, handicap = 0.97±2.3). Three-dimensional kinematics of the feet, shanks, thighs, pelvis, and thorax were recorded (Optotrak Certus, Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo, ON) during passive IR ROM tests, and during 10 golf swings with a driver. All kinematic data were processed using Visual3D (C-Motion Inc., Germantown, MD). Peak IR of the lead hip was extracted from the passive ROM trial, and each golf swing trial. The Pearson product–moment correlation between the peak lead hip IR that occurred during the passive ROM test, and the 10-swing average of the peak hip IR that occurred during the golf swings was assessed using SPSS (SPSS Corporation, Chicago, IL). RESULTS: On average, golfers used 95.4±14.4% of their passive ROM in IR during the golf swing. A significant positive correlation was observed between the passive ROM for the lead hip in IR and the amount of IR on the same hip during the golf swing (p = 0.002, r = 0.854). The slope and intercept for the line-of-best-fit were 0.93 and 1.20 respectively. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated a very strong positive relationship between a golfer’s passive hip ROM in IR and the amount of IR used during the golf swing. During the golf swing, participants in this study also approached their physiological capacity for lead hip IR. Golfers with limited hip IR may compensate by using more lumbar spine motion to perform the golf swing, which may be related to the occurrence of LBP. These findings support the need for a comprehensive physical examination and screening of the hip to investigate the potential causes and consequences of LBP in golfers. Therapeutic intervention aimed at improving lead hip IR-ROM, or swing/stance modifications may help prevent and manage LBP experienced by golfers.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».