MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2506428914 · doi:10.2118/2005-100

Heats of Combustion of Selected Crude Oils and Their SARA Fractions

2005· article· en· W2506428914 sur OpenAlex
Gerardo Mendez, S. A. Lestz, R.G. Moore, M.G. Ursenbach, E. Zalewski

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineChemistry
ThématiquePetroleum Processing and Analysis
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Mots-clésCombustionPetroleum engineeringCrude oilEnvironmental scienceChemistryWaste managementGeologyEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract In situ combustion and high-pressure air injection areenhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes used to recover oil from both heavy and light oil reservoirs. These processes, especially in situ combustion, are quite complex. In situ combustion involves consideration of heat and mass transfer, phase behavior of oil, water and gas, as well as relative permeability effects. This paper outlines the study that was conducted in order to develop a better understanding of the heats of combustion (HOC) for three different types of crude oils and their respective Saturates, Aromatics, Resins and Asphaltenes (SARA) fractions. One outcome of the study indicated that saturates andaromatics have higher heating values than resins and asphaltenes, where this value in both saturates and aromatics (in any given crude oil) is close. Resins and asphaltenes also displayed heating values that were almost the same, however, consistently with a lower heating value than saturates and aromatics. The Linear Mixing Rule was applied to predict the heat of combustion for the three crude oils studied. The HOCs for the maltenes and asphaltenes fractions were mathematically combined (per the mixing rule) to predict the actual observed HOC of the combined maltenes/asphaltenes crude. This rule did not hold true for all the crude oils studied however, which suggests that the heat of combustion is not necessarily independent of the presence of the other fractions. Introduction In situ combustion and high-pressure air injection are technologies used for the recovery of both heavy and light crude oils. These technologies when used in tandem, involve thecreation of an oxidation front in the reservoir with subsequent propagation by air injection. Generally, air is injected in the reservoir and the oxygen contained in the air reacts with the oil through various oxidation reactions. The burning front is formed and the combustion gases produced from these reactions are available to help displace the oil. This process offers economic and technical opportunities for improved oil recovery in many reservoirs. Many thermal analysis studies on both light and heavycrude oils have been conducted and several oxidation tests for modeling the process have been performed. Verkoczy and Freitag(1) applied the relevance of various oxidation reactions to the modeling of in situ combustion inheavy oils, through three different sets of experiments. They performed thermal gravimetric scans and autoclave tests on three heavy oils and their SARA fractions. They found that low-temperature oxidation had significant and sometimes dramatic effects on the amount of coke formation. They also found that asphaltenes apparently underwent low-temperature oxidation more rapidly than other crude fractions. K?k et al. ( (2) (used thermo gravimetric analysis under an air atmosphere at a 10 ° C/min heating rate. Two oils (medium and heavy) were separated into their SARA fractions. Then a quantitative investigation was performed in order to determine the temperature intervals at which evaporation, oxidation andcombustion effects operated for each fraction. Kinetic parameters of SARA fractions according to the Coat and Redfern technique were also established.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,128
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,224 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle