MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2508035497

Research note : Paul Tschetter's "Chicago Fire" hymn

2007· review· en· W2508035497 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rod Janzen, Jean Janzen

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2007
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgriculture and Farm Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnabaptistsPopulationHymnPoliticsMilitary serviceResidenceHistoryGermanGenealogyEthnologyDemographySociologyGeographyPolitical scienceEconomic historyLawTheologyArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In summer of 1873, a 31-year-old Hutterite minister, Paul Tschetter, accompanied by his uncle Lohrentz, joined a delegation of ten Russian Mennonites, on a well-known four-month exploratory journey to North America. A Russian government edict (ukase), announced by Tsar Alexander I in 1870, threatened to strip away many of political, educational and religious rights that Mennonites and Hutterites had enjoyed for almost 100 years. Particularly alarming was retraction of agreements granting Anabaptists (along with other German-speaking colonists and some Russian religious dissenters) exemption from military service. The Mennonites and Hutterites were also to lose full control of village and colony schools and some local government offices. In response to this new policy, Hutterite men had come west to investigate possibility of resettlement for thousands of Anabaptists living in Russian Empire. Paul Tschetter was born in 1842 at Blumenort village in Molotschna Colony, same year that entire population of about 400 Hutterites relocated to Molotschna region from their previous residence (Raditschewa) northeast of Kiev. The Hutterites were given considerable organizational and financial assistance from Johann Cornies, Mennonite chair of Agricultural Improvement Society. (1) Tschetter spent most of his growing up years in village of Hutterthal, established a few miles south of Molotschna Colony in 1843. Here he attended school and worked on family farm. At age 18 Tschetter married Maria Waltner and six years later (in 1866) was ordained to Hutterite ministry. He held this position during a difficult and contentious period in Hutterite history, when a number of members resurrected a communal way of life in adherence to historic traditions that had been given up in 1821. (2) From 1868 to 1874 Tschetter served as minister at noncommunal Hutterite church at Neu Hutterthal village. He was chosen to represent both communal and noncommunal Hutterites in 1873 exploration due to recognized leadership capabilities as well as an adventurous willingness to make excursion. During this important journey Tschetter and other Anabaptist delegates, accompanied by Mennonite publisher John F. Funk and Northern Pacific Railroad personnel, looked at undeveloped land between Nebraska and Manitoba (some of delegates also visited Kansas and Ontario), traveling by land, rail and steamboat. Along way group analyzed land prices, settlement patterns, and water and feed sources, as well as access to markets. In general, Tschetter was pleased with what he saw, especially in Red River valley in what is now northeastern North Dakota. He loved rich black soil in Pembina area and fact that there was forested land nearby. (3) Tschetter was concerned, however, that United States government had not confirmed exemption from military service. For this reason, in August 1873 he, along with his uncle, Lohrentz Tschetter, and a Volhynian Mennonite minister named Tobias Unruh, secured a personal audience with President Ulysses S. Grant, before their return to Russia. (4) Throughout his travels in 1873 Tschetter maintained a diary recording details of all aspects of his journey. (5) The diary also gives a clear indication of how Tschetter viewed the world and is an important window into late-nineteenth-century Hutterian mind. Tschetter complains often, for example, about frivolous behavior. On one occasion, after seeing large groups of men and women dancing at a Hamburg eating establishment, he wrote that they should rather be praying than dancing. (6) In eastern United States, Tschetter was dismayed when he met Mennonites and Amish who grew and smoked tobacco. Many also owned guns and a few played musical instruments. (7) The Hutterites were opposed to these practices. Paul Tschetter's handwritten journal is divided into three small booklets. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,078
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,155

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0070,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0460,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,095
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewMême sujetAgriculture and Farm SafetyTravaux en français237 207