Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Richard Rose, William Mishler, and Neil Munro. Popular Support for an Undemocratic Regime: The Changing Views of Russians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. vii, 206 pp. Index. $88.00, cloth; $30.99, paper.In this concise volume, the authors provide an engaging analysis of Russian society during the Putin era. The book's main purpose is to explain why Russians have chosen to support the Russian president, a man whose tenure at the helm has resulted in an increasingly centralized, corrupt, and undemocratic political system. Sifting through the results of nationwide surveys taken since early 1992, the authors present some startling findings- findings that may well inform the understanding of undemocratic regimes' longevity in other settings.The volume begins with an overview of various theoretical perspectives on regime support, be such regimes liberal democratic or authoritarian in nature. Thereafter, the authors thoughtfully include a succinct summary of Russian politics, from Stalin to Yeltsin, which serves as a nice addition to the volume, particularly for readers not well versed in Soviet-era politics. These first two chapters are then joined in a third, wherein the authors discuss the questionable methods used by Putin to construct an institutionalized noncompetitive party system, one that has seen the Russian president repatriate power to the Kremlin in other political arenas as well.The remainder of the text is devoted to testing in the Russian context a variety of hypotheses deduced from the theoretical frameworks discussed at the start. To do so, the authors draw from voluminous dataseis compiled from 18 nationwide, face-to-face interviews conducted between 1992 and 2009.The authors begin their explanation of the durability of Putin's regime with the realization that, although over 4/5 of Russians support in the abstract, as the political system has become less democratic over time, popular support for the regime has grown. Indeed, support for Putin's managed democracy is equivalent to that level found in previously communist-now fully democratic-states of Eastern Europe.Social distinctions are examined first in order to determine which Russians have tended to support the regime more. Among age, gender, educational level, social status, and other factors tested in their regression analysis, the authors find that only social status has an effect upon support, with those respondents from higher than average social backgrounds generally supporting the regime more than those at the other end of the social scale. If true, the fact that so many of the Russian protesters turning out in late 2011 were apparently educated professionals would appear to be a rather worrisome development for the present ruling authorities. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».