Dismantling the organism: Race and power in a first nations music video
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper was presented in a symposium session chaired by Kathy Mills entitled: Literacy as a Body without Organs: Democratic Assemblages, Multiplicities, and Intensities of Multimodal Practices. The session draws on Deleuze and Guattari’s (1987) metaphor of the “body without organs” to open democratic dialogue about the assemblages, democratic multiplicities, and intensities of multimodal literacy practices that are often augmented and metamorphosed by digital technologies. Enacting this vision, we position our work to “experiment with the opportunities it offers, find an advantageous place on it, [and] find potential movements of deterritorialization” (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, p. 161). The session brings together literacy theorists in the digital times to produce both flows and conjunctions of ideas. We address one challenge: to “try out continuums of intensities segment by segment…” (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, p. 161). Overall Session Summary Objectives: We aim to catalyze “conjugated flows” of literacy practices among the five presentations, demonstrating instances of multimodal and digitally mediated communication from around the world. Together, we ultimately escape from the box to bring forth intensities of literacy practices to imagine a new kind of “body without organs” (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, p. 161). Forming a creative response to AERA’s 2016 theme: “Public Scholarship to Educate Diverse Democracies” we demonstrate how literacy practices can be conceived as democratic assemblages that account for diverse multiplicities of identity, culture and practice. The aim is not to become caught up in endless self-reproduction, but to bring together new “assemblages”, “segmentarities”, and “lines of flight” to create new “intensities” of literacy practices that are mediated by digital technologies and that are realized locally and globally (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, p. 161). Overview: Uniting perspectives of literacy, diversity, and democratic practices in education, the symposium session will begin by introducing the Deleuze-Guattarian (1987) concept of the Body without Organs (BwO), offering an invitation to literacy studies to address three related issues of affect, materiality and the body, and temporality, especially in relation to immanence and emergence. The second speaker will extend the Body Without Organs concept by "dismantling the organism" of schooled literacy through a multimodal video analysis of race portrayed by Indigenous students in Australia. The third presentation explores assemblages of literacy as a Body without Organs through a longitudinal case study that reveals the development of a boy's self at two points in time - age 6 and 12 - and captures the fluidity and multiplicity that accompanies becoming through the boy's assemblage of online and transnational literacy practices, self-portraits, and talk about texts. The fourth presentation uses Deleuze and Guattari's concept to "deterritorialise" pedagogy with ELL's by showing how aesthetics and critical literacy can be productively brought together. The final speaker will provide a cautionary conclusion to guard against blind faith in digital media as a new kind of Body without Organs. Scholarly Significance: The papers in this symposium have vital scholarly significance because it is through diverse theory generation, metamorphosing, and augmentation of the existing strata of multimodal literacy theory for diverse social and cultural groups that we can succeed in freeing new lines of theoretical and pedagogical flight in a digital age. Structure of the Session: Each of the five papers challenges current thinking about literacy practices by focusing powerful lenses on multimodal and often digital literacy practices, layering contrasting and complementary viewpoints to democratize the way we see and practice literacy education. The session presenters include Kevin Leander, Kathy A. Mills, Catherine Compton-Lilly, Jennifer Alford and Peter Smagorinsky. It concluded with discussant, Professor Arnetha Ball (AERA President, 2011-2012), who powerfully synthesised and highlighted the salient principles of the presentations to inspire an equitable and democratic vision for the future of literacy and diversity. Reference: Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».