MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2512652587 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.736.736

Ubap2l-Bmi-1-Rnf2 Define a Novel Polycomb Complex Essential For Self-Renewal Of Hematopoietic Stem Cells

2013· article· en· W2512652587 sur OpenAlexaff
Marie-Ève Bordeleau, Jalila Chagraoui, Romain Aucagne, Simon Girard, Éric Bonneil, Martin Sauvageau, Amélie Faubert, Pierre Thibault, Guy Sauvageau

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBMI1HaematopoiesisStem cellPolycomb-group proteinsBiologyImmunoprecipitationHematopoietic stem cellBone marrowCell biologyCell cycleCellCancer researchGeneticsTranscription factorImmunologyCell cultureRepressorGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The polycomb group protein Bmi-1 is a well known determinant of hematopoietic stem cell function. Bmi-1-/- mice display severe hematopoietic defects, including progressive loss of hematopoietic cells from the bone marrow. Bmi-1 is dispensable for hematopoietic stem cell specification, but essential for their maintenance, an effect attributable to its ability to promote HSC self-renewal. The mechanism by which Bmi-1 regulates this process is not completely understood. Bmi-1 has been shown to repress the INK4A/ARF locus encoding the cell cycle inhibitors p16ink4a and p19arf , to interact with the E4F1 protein and to regulate the DNA damage response pathway, however experimental manipulation of these proteins/pathways only partially rescues the hematopoietic defects of the Bmi-1-/-mice. It thus appears that the mechanism by which Bmi-1 regulates HSC self-renewal remains to be determined. Towards this goal, we purified Bmi-1 containing protein complexes from cellular extracts and identified Bmi-1 interaction partners by mass spectrometry. We observed that the protein Ubap2l, which has never been shown to associate with Bmi-1 and for which no link with polycomb group protein function has been described, was consistently found in Bmi-1-containing protein complexes. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that Ubap2l indirectly associates with Bmi-1 via an interaction with the polycomb group protein Rnf2. We then evaluated the possibility that Ubap2l might be involved in the regulation of HSC activity. We observed that Ubap2l transcripts are more abundant in primitive HSC populations compared to total BM. CFC assays performed with BM cells infected with Ubap2l shRNAs revealed that Ubap2l knockdown causes a modest and progressive loss of progenitor activity when cells are kept in culture, with multipotent and bipotent progenitors being substantially more affected than unipotent progenitors. We transplanted these cells in mice and observed a gradual decrease in the percentage of donor derived cells expressing Ubap2l shRNAs in the peripheral blood of the recipient mice, with the most striking effect observed 16 weeks post-transplantation in the BM. Bmi-1 has been shown to regulate the proliferative capacity of both progenitor and stem cells, and its deletion in BM cells is known to dramatically reduce the reconstitution activity of these cells at early time points following transplantation. In contrast, Ubap2l appears to preferentially regulate LTR-HSC activity. We tested the effects of Ubap2l silencing on leukemic cells in vivo and observed that a reduction of Ubap2l levels in these cells had an important impact on their ability to reconstitute recipient mice, suggesting that Ubap2l also plays a role in leukemic stem cell activity. We determined if the mechanism by which Ubap2l regulates HSC activity is related to Bmi-1 function by simultaneously introducing Bmi-1 cDNA and Ubap2l shRNAs in BM cells and found that Bmi-1 is able to rescue the long-term reconstitution defect caused by Ubap2l downregulation in these cells. We observed that Ubap2l silencing does not significantly affect the expression of the known Bmi-1 targets p16ink4a and p19arf, implying that Ubap2l regulates HSC activity via a Bmi-1-dependent mechanism that does not involve repression of the INK4A/ARF locus. One explanation for the two Bmi-1 dependent mechanisms at play in the regulation of HSC activity could be that Bmi-1 is part of two separate protein complexes, each regulating different aspects of hematopoietic cell function. To test this hypothesis, we fractionated cellular extracts and were indeed able to resolve two distinct Bmi-1 containing protein complexes, distinguishable by the presence of Ubap2l. Based on the results we obtained, we propose a model in which two different Bmi-1 containing protein complexes regulate hematopoietic stem cell function. An Ubap2l-independent complex, which is most likely involved in the repression of the INK4A/ARF locus, and could be responsible for the effects of Bmi-1 on multipotent progenitors and STR-HSCs, and an Ubap2l-dependent complex, which operates via a yet to be defined mechanism unrelated to p16Ink4a and p19Arf, and would account for the effects of Bmi-1 on LTR-HSC activity. These results position Ubap2l as a key regulator of LTR-HSC activity and unveil a novel protein complex mediating the effects of Bmi-1 on LTR-HSCs. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→Travaux en français237 207→