Frailty assessment – who, when and how?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We would like to commend Dr. O'Neill and colleagues on their recent study into the role of clinical impression in recognising frailty in the surgical population 1. We believe that the identification of frail patients will become increasingly important to anaesthetists as evidence demonstrating higher peri-operative morbidity and mortality in this population group increases, and it is reassuring that clinical impression may be a quick and reliable tool to assist in this process. The authors assessed elective surgical patients in a clinic environment, but these findings may be even more relevant to the emergency surgical population, in whom ‘eye-balling’ in the hours, or even minutes, before surgery may be the best test available. As the authors note, much of the work in this area has been limited by difficulties in both defining and measuring frailty. There are simply too many scales and indices currently being used, and as anaesthetists we require a simple, quick and reproducible tool. One such tool is the Edmonton Frail Scale, a 17-point scale validated for use by non-geriatricians to assess frailty, which takes approximately 5 min to complete per patient 2. The scale is available as an App on both Android and iOS platforms (Create Multimedia, Evergem, Belgium) and is free to download. It includes the ‘timed up and go’ test mentioned in the accompanying editorial 3, which may preclude its use in the emergency situation, but we feel it is a useful addition to the anaesthetist's armory in assessing these patients. Casting the net even wider, we may ask whether it should even fall to the anaesthetist to make these initial impressions. For elective procedures, these tools could be utilised in primary care, identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from ‘prehabilitation’ and prescribed exercise programmes to modify outcome 4, and informing postoperative destination at the point of referral. Recent evidence suggests these patients are at higher risk in the early postoperative period 5, and there may be an argument for higher dependency care in some situations. It may also be appropriate for General Practitioners to initiate and plan for appropriate enhanced social care packages following hospital discharge. It is evident that the importance of frailty as a risk factor in both emergency and elective surgery can no longer be ignored. We feel that there needs to be a greater emphasis on the identification of these patients, both in terms of anaesthetic training, and in the primary care and surgical outpatients settings. Simple tools such as the Edmonton Frail Scale may be useful when used alongside clinical impression and we would encourage readers to get out there and try this for themselves.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».