MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2513721870 · doi:10.18843/rwjasc/v7i3/11

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS-THE GAME OF PROFIT AND LOSS: A STUDY OF INDIAN BANKING SECTOR

2016· article· en· W2513721870 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Prof. Ritesh Patel -, D. O. Shah

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & Commerce · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueFinancial Reporting and Valuation Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMergers and acquisitionsMarket shareBusinessProductivityRevenueProfit maximizationProfit (economics)EconomicsIndustrial organizationFinanceMicroeconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION:The Indian banking sector is a spine of Indian economy. In the last few years, the Indian banking sector has made brisk growth in terms of revenue due to favourable factors, but few banks were not able to perform well. To improve performance, many banks were merged with other banks. Apart from this objective, the merger is to improve banking services, create operational and financial synergy, market share gain, value maximization, market expansion & creation of large identity. Among all this, the matter that needs much concern is how the merger affects the overall financial performance of banks.In 1980, merger and company performance was an important issue in front of management thinkers. An empirical study (Michael Lubatkin, 1983) has made an argument that merger results in improvement of the firm's performance. Studies in 90's have also examined the performance of the firm. (Healy, 1992) has studied the performance of firms using a sample of the 50 largest mergers between U.S. public, industrial firms completed in the period 1979 to 1983. A Study has revealed that after the merger, there was improvement in performance in terms of assets utilization, productivity and long-term investment. (Marcia, 1991) had analysed the post-merger financial performance of largest banks merged during 1982 to 1987& enhanced that after merger, assets growth and employee productivity has improved. Some argue that mergers and acquisitions activities create agency problems, resulting in less than optimal returns (Jensen, 1986) where as others argue that M&A create synergies that result into benefit for firm (Weston et al, 2004).This is a comprehensive review of the merger and firm's performance. Again, there is no systematic literature review of merger and firm's performance which has been measured from different parameters. Given the fact that, the merger and firm's performance has scope for further studies. Thus, there is a need to analyses pre & post-merger impact of merger on financial performance. Research Gap can be seen at various points in present studies where there are scope for further study. So, to fulfil this gap, this present study will address the Comparison of pre & post-merger financial performance using Economic Value Added (EVA). The main objective of this study is to Analyse the comparative position of pre & post-merger financial performance of selected banks.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 explains the theoretical background of different literature on merger and firm's performance. The methodology is presented in Section 3. Empirical evidence and discussion on data analysis is presented in Section 4. Conclusion is presented in section 5.Below given table 1 shows various merger happen in Indian banking industry.RESEARCH QUESTION:RQ. - Does the financial performance of all banks involved in merger gets improve after merger?LITERATURE REVIEW:Many researchers have analysed pre & post-merger performance of merged firm. Researchers from all over the world has taken various industries & carried out research work on merger & firm's performance. The detailed literature reviews are discussed for the merger happened in Canada, Dubai, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, U.K & U.S.A. Some researchers have made an argument that mergers and acquisitions result in negative outcome (Jensen, 1986) where as others argues that M&A improves the firm's performance (Weston et al, 2004). Here, this section contains the Theoretical background on merger and firm's financial performance.Financial performance of firm refers to measurement that how well a firm can able to manage its assets for generation of revenue and profit. There are various measures to study the financial performance such as income, assets, profit and profitability ratios. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,073
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,395

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,125
Tête enseignante GPT0,368
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResearchers World – Journal of Arts Science & CommerceMême sujetFinancial Reporting and Valuation ResearchTravaux en français237 207