Diversity Of Personality Types For Engineering In The New Millennium
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract Session 2630 Diversity of Personality Types for Engineering in the New Millennium. Peter Rosati and Judit E. Puskas. The University of Western Ontario Abstract A ten-year study at the University of Western Ontario (UWO) has related the personality type (MBTI) of a large group (n=1865) of Canadian engineering students to the progress of those students through the engineering program to graduation. It has been found that the entry class, in comparison with general first-year students, contains a large proportion of I_TJ (introverted, thinking, judging) types and an even larger proportion of these same I_TJ types graduate in engineering. On the other hand the 'opposite' E_FP (extraverted, feeling, perceptive) types form a much smaller proportion of the entry class and furthermore feature significantly in the group of students who withdraw after or during first year and also in the group who transfer out of engineering and graduate in non-engineering disciplines. Can the engineering profession afford to be under-represented in E_FP types who by nature adapt well to change, enjoy variety and action, are interested in people and are good communicators? As a follow-up to the main UWO study, it was decided to survey a subset of engineering graduate alumni (from the original MBTI cohort) asking about their current job description and job satisfaction. There were 45 responses from graduates with a preference for FP and 35 responses from graduates with a preference for TJ. This paper presents the results from this alumni survey and compares the responses and comments from the engineers with the minority FP ( feeling, perceptive) preference with those from the engineers with the majority TJ (thinking, judging) preference. Introduction National engineering groups both in Canada1 and in the United States2 remind us that engineering is changing faster than ever before. Accelerating programs in R&D together with the information technology explosion are leading to a "fusion of technologies" and the " merging of once disparate fields". This is leading to an engineering employment shift from manufacturing to service industries and from large co Bob Sternmpanies to smaller engineering enterprises. Such changes place added demands on engineers. Not only must they preserve a broad technical base with the ability to develop and transfer their expertise to other areas but they must also be able to cope with technical and societal change involving a variety of social, political and environmental factors. What are the personality characteristics in tomorrow's engineers that would naturally equip them to deal with such novel technical demands and interpersonal challenges?
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».