Fertility Recovery Following Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplantation in Aplastic Anemia; A Study of 157 Patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction : Infertility is a major late effect of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). In aplastic anemia (AA) patients, although the fertility recovery rate is relatively higher than other diseases but the exact incidence and risk factors are not very well studied. In this study, we attempted to evaluate incidence and the impact of patientÕs characteristics and transplantation procedures on fertility recovery following allogeneic HSCT for adolescent and adults patients with AA. Methods : A total of 157 patients who were at least 14 years old with AA receiving HSCT between year 1987 and 2014 at our center were reviewed. Patients who survived at least 2 years following HSCT and either married or in relationship were included in the analysis and evaluated for fertility following HSCT. 87 patients were eligible for the study. Questionnaire survey and long-term charts were used for data collection. With a response rate and or available information of 63% patients, 55 patients were identified and stratified into fertility recovery (FR+) versus non-fertility recovery (FR-) group. Fertility recovery was defined by a pregnancy of the patient or his partner. Results: Median age for all patients is 23 years (range, 14 -50), 44% (n=24) between 14-20 years old, 51% (n=28) between age 20-40 years and 5% (n=3) > 40 years. 51% (n=28) were females. Matched related donor was used for majority of patients 96% (n=53). GVHD prophylaxis was CSA/MTX for 93% (n=51,). Conditioning regimen was Cyclophosphamide/Flu in 25 (45%), Cyclophosphamide /ATG in 18 patients (35%) and others in 12 patients (20%). Bone marrow was the source of stem cells for 52 patients (94%). A median follow-up of 8 years for survivors (range, 0.3 -23) showed 45 patients (82%) had FR+ while 10 patients (18%) were FR-. Median duration of fertility recovery (from delivery to BMT) was 6 years (range, 0.8-19) with significant difference based on age groups, 4 years for patients 20-40 years (n=29, 53%) versus 8 years for those < 20 years (n=24, 44%), (p=0.002), (Figure 1). None of the patients >40 years old (n=2, 4%) had fertility recovery. Comparison based on gender showed no significant difference. Males had a median duration of fertility recovery of 5.9 years, (range 0.6-14.9) versus 6.2 years, (range, 0.8-15.2) (p=0.31) females. The overall median number of pregnancies was 2 (range, 1-6). For males, it was 2 (range, 1-6) while 1.5 (range, 1-5) for females (p=0.26). Deliveries occurred in natural ways in (95%) while C-section for (5%). All deliveries were without fetal abnormalities. Univariate analysis of risk factors for fertility recovery showed age group (p=0.03) and chronic GVHD (p=0.05) are important factors. Neither gender of patients or type of preparative regimens used for HSCT (Cyclo/ATG vs Cyclo/Flu) was a risk factor. In multivariate analysis, age group was the only confirmed an independent risk factor for fertility recovery (p=0.02) [HR= 2.02, CI=1.012-3.64). Conclusion: The present study suggested that the incidence of fertility recovery following HSCT for patients with aplastic anemia is high with no significant differences between males and females. Patients between the ages of 20-40 years at the time of HSCT have significantly shorter recovery period. Age was the only independent risk factor for fertility recovery while there was no impact of whether ATG or Fludarabine was used in addition to Cyclophosphamide as preparative regimen. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Kim: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».