Cognitive impairment associated with chemotherapy for breast cancer: An exploratory case-control study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
8501 Background: There is evidence that some women suffer cognitive impairment after adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) for breast cancer and it may be sustained. We report a case-control study to explore underlying mechanisms with blood tests and functional imaging. Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer within 5 years were recruited to 3 groups of 20. Cases (group A) had received CT and self-reported cognitive dysfunction on a prototype FACT-COG questionnaire. There were 2 groups of controls: group B had received CT but did not report cognitive problems; group C had breast cancer but did not receive CT. Comprehensive tests of cognitive function (2.5 hr) were performed. Blood tests evaluated sex hormones, coagulation factors, 10 cytokines, and apolipoprotein genotype. Functional MRI (fMRI) scans were performed while subjects performed a mental task. Results: Currently, 60 women have completed FACT-COG, 39 have undergone neuropsychological assessment and 31 have completed fMRI; testing and analysis will be complete by May 2006. Median time from diagnosis was 2 years. There was increased self-report of cognitive impairment in CT vs non-CT patients (p<0.0001). Formal cognitive testing disclosed more impairment in group C (no CT) as compared to groups A and B: 29% vs 0% by classical tests (p=0.046), and 61% vs 47% and 25% (p=0.38) by computerized testing. This may be due to slight imbalance of demographic factors. Decreased activation in fMRI was seen in frontal areas and right parahippocampus of women who self-reported greater cognitive impairment (p<0.0005), while separate frontal areas show increased activity in women with greater objective cognitive impairment (p<0.0005). Patients who received CT reported more fatigue than non-CT patients (p=0.027). There was an association between fatigue and self-reported cognitive impairment (p=0.004) and anxiety and depression (General Health Questionnaire) (p=0.009), but not with objective cognitive testing. As yet there is no significant correlation between symptoms and cytokine levels. Conclusions: Self-reported cognitive impairment is associated with prior chemotherapy and changes in fMRI but not with formal cognitive testing. The larger sample size is required to confirm these changes and explore possible mechanisms. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».