Stable Long-Term Risk of Leukemia in Patients with Severe Congenital Neutropenia Maintained On G-CSF Therapy.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3206 Poster Board III-143 BACKGROUND G-CSF therapy reduces sepsis mortality in patients with severe congenital neutropenia (SCN), but effective therapy has revealed a high syndromic predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML), particularly in patients who require higher doses of G-CSF. Although the long-term risk of MDS/AML after 10 or more years on therapy remains uncertain, prior data on the limited number of patients with long-term follow-up suggested the hazard rate might be as high as 8%/year after 12 years on G-CSF. METHODS We updated prospective follow-up of 374 well-characterized patients with SCN on long-term G-CSF enrolled in the Severe Chronic Neutropenia International Registry (Blood. 2006 Jun 15; 107(12):4628-35). We ascertained event-free time, deaths from sepsis, and MDS/AML events that accrued since our previous report. Follow-up was censored for patients who received a bone marrow transplant. RESULTS The update yielded 3590 person-years of follow-up versus 2043 in the prior report; among patients treated for 10 or more years, there were 849 person-years versus just 67 previously. In all, there were 61 MDS/AML events and 29 deaths from sepsis, versus prior totals of 44 and 19, respectively. After including up-to-date follow-up, the estimated annual hazard of death from sepsis remained qualitatively stable, at 0.81%/year (95% Confidence Interval, CI: 0.56 – 1.16%/year). Similarly, during the first five years after the start of G-CSF therapy, the updated estimate of the hazard curve for MDS/AML showed the same increasing trend as the previous estimate. However, in contrast to the prior estimate that showed a subsequent increasing trend over time (with a large margin of error), the updated hazard curve attained a plateau: after 10 years on G-CSF, the estimated hazard of MDS/AML was 2.3%/year (95% CI: 1.7 – 2.9%/year). Although this aspect of the natural history appears less dire than first suggested, after 15 years on G-CSF, the cumulative incidence was 10% (95% CI: 6 – 14%) for death from sepsis and 22% (95% CI: 17 – 28%) for MDS/AML. Furthermore, for the subset of patients who failed to achieve at 6 months an absolute neutrophil count at or above the median value for the cohort (2188 cells/μL) despite doses of G-CSF at or above the median (8 μg/kg/day), the cumulative incidence after 15 years on G-CSF was 18% (95% CI: 7 – 28%) for death from sepsis and 34% (95% CI: 21 – 47%) for MDS/AML. With additional follow-up, the association of G-CSF dose at 6 months with the relative hazard of MDS/AML became more strongly statistically significant (P = 0.003 versus P = 0.024; the hazard of MDS/AML increased by 1.24-fold (95% CI: 1.08-1.43-fold) per doubling of the dose of G-CSF). CONCLUSIONS For SCN patients maintained on G-CSF therapy, the hazard of MDS/AML over the long-term falls significantly below the range suggested by preliminary data. The updated hazard estimate of 2.3%/year after 10 years on G-CSF (which includes both MDS and AML events) is similar to that for other inherited bone marrow failure syndromes with a high intrinsic risk of AML, notably Fanconi anemia and dyskeratosis congenita. Nonetheless, the cumulative incidence of both MDS/AML and sepsis death rises to very high levels, and the data continue to support the hypothesis that SCN patients with higher G-CSF requirements are also at higher risk of leukemia. Disclosures Boxer: Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership. Dale:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speaker.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».