MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2520104496 · doi:10.1149/ma2016-02/38/2840

A Rapid Ex-Situ alternative for Mechanical Accelerated Stress Testing of Fuel Cells

2016· article· en· W2520104496 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Alireza Sadeghi Alavijeh, Erik Kjeang, Senthil Velan Venkatesan, Will Kim, Ramin M.H. Khorasany

Notice bibliographique

RevueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueFuel Cells and Related Materials
Établissements canadiensSimon Fraser University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDurabilityMaterials scienceCreepProton exchange membrane fuel cellStress (linguistics)Composite materialMembrane electrode assemblyElectrolyteFuel cellsElectrodeChemical engineeringChemistryEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The durability of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) is one of the main challenges facing the commercialization of automotive fuel cells. The lifetime of the membrane, a critical structural component of PEFCs, is one of the principal obstacles in achieving the fuel cell industry durability targets [1]. Under dynamic automotive operating conditions and duty cycles, the membrane is subjected to chemical and mechanical degradation, which could cause hydrogen leaks and ultimate cell failure. Chemical degradation is linked to the polymer molecular decomposition caused by radical species formed during the fuel cell operation as by-products of electrochemical reactions [2]. On the other hand, mechanical degradation is attributed to the fracture caused by the induced mechanical and hygrothermal stresses in a constrained cell [2]. The US Department of Energy (DOE) introduced standardized in-situ accelerated stress test (AST) protocols [3]. Following the DOE mechanical AST protocol, the membrane mechanical durability under pure humidity cycling was investigated [4]. In this manner, two customized in-situ mechanical AST protocols were utilized by our group to evaluate the mechanical durability of PEFCs, indicating significant decay in mechanical properties, formation of microstructural cracks, and initiation of failure [5]. Despite the valuable outputs of the in-situ studies, the current protocols are time consuming and costly. As hygrothermal fatigue is expected to dominate the membrane mechanical lifetime, an ex-situ mechanical fatigue-creep based AST was recently developed by our group as a more convenient alternative [6]. The proposed ex-situ tensile fatigue-creep test demonstrated in this work is intended to evaluate the mechanical durability of catalyst coated membranes (CCMs) in a fraction of the time required for the conventional in-situ tests [7]. The proposed ex-situ tensile fatigue-creep accelerated stress test (TFC-AST) was conducted on dog bone shaped [8] CCM samples using a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA) equipped with environmental chamber. After equilibration at 80°C and 50% RH, as illustrated in Figure 1, a high frequency sinusoidal cyclic tensile load with stress ratio (R) of 0.2 and 6.1 MPa mean stress was applied on the CCM samples to certain fractions of fatigue lifetime (~140,000 cycles) [7]. When compared to the well-defined standard in-situ mechanical ASTs which last about 8 weeks [5], the proposed TFC-AST results in mechanical failure ~400 times faster than the in-situ tests due to higher frequency and magnitude of fatigue and creep loading. Depending on the total lifetime, TFC-ASTs were interrupted at different fractions of the CCM lifetime, i.e. 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%, and partially fatigued samples were extracted for analysis. The obtained partially degraded CCMs were further studied through mechanical and microstructural techniques. The mechanical properties of the extracted CCMs were investigated via tensile and hygrothermal expansion experiments in the same manner as reported in [9] using DMA. Tensile tests revealed remarkable increase in the tensile strength of the partially degraded samples indicating the alignment of the polymer molecules along the TFC stress direction. CCM thermal and hygral expansions were evaluated by stepwise increase in temperature and relative humidity, respectively. Interestingly, the CCM was found to contract, which is contradictory to the typical hygrothermal expansion behaviour of these materials [5,9]. This behaviour can be attributed to the exclusively tensile loading of the TFC-AST. In addition to the mechanical testing, morphological evolution of the TFC-AST degraded CCMs was also examined and compared with the analogous in-situ mechanical AST degraded CCMs using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The TEM micrographs provided supplementary evidence regarding the reorientation of membrane molecules along the TFC stress direction. However, the mechanical failure of the specimens was found to be dominated by fatigue, similarly to the corresponding in-situ tests. Figure 1. Schematic of the proposed tensile fatigue-creep accelerated stress test (TFC-AST) protocol for rapid mechanical durability testing of fuel cells. Acknowledgements: This research was supported by Ballard Power Systems and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through an Automotive Partnership Canada grant. References: [1] Fuel Cell Technical Team Roadmap Hydrogen Storage Technologies Roadmap, 2013. [2] C.S. Gittleman, et al. (Eds.), Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Degradation, Elsevier Inc., 2012, pp. 15–88. [3] U.S. Department of Energy, DOE Cell Component Accelerated Stress Test, 2010. [4] Y.H. Lai, et al., J Fuel Cell Sci Tech, 6, 021002, 2009. [5] A. Sadeghi Alavijeh, et al., J Electrochem Soc. 162, F1461, 2015. [6] R. Khorasany et al. J Power Sources, 274, 1208, 2015. [7] A. Sadeghi Alavijeh, et al., J Power Sources, 312, 123, 2016. [8] R. Khorasany et al., Int J Hydrogen Energy, in press. [9] A. Sadeghi Alavijeh, et al., Fuel Cells, 15, 204, 2015. Figure 1

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueECS Meeting Abstracts→Même sujetFuel Cells and Related Materials→Travaux en français237 207→