An Open-Label Phase 2 Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Oral Dexamethasone in the Previously Untreated, Symptomatic Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2895 Introduction: Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with promising anti-tumor activity in CLL. The use of lenalidomide in this disease, however, can be complicated by tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and frequent tumor flare (TF). From our experience using low-dose lenalidomide (starting dose 2.5mg, titrating to a target of 10mg daily), TLS can be prevented but TF remains frequent (Chen et al. JCO 2010). In addition, when using low-dose single-agent lenalidomide, few complete responses (CR) are achieved. We therefore proposed the combination of lenalidomide and pulse dexamethasone, aiming to enhance anti-tumor activity through both synergy and mitigation of toxicities such as TF, enabling escalation to higher doses of lenalidomide. Our previous observation of “rebound” peripheral lymphocytosis when using intermittent dosing of lenalidomide led to the current use of continuous daily dosing. We present an interim analysis of the initial 18 of 31 planned pts in this ongoing trial of lenalidomide and dexamethasone as first-line CLL therapy. Methods: Eligible pts were previously untreated with symptomatic CLL (cytopenias, symptomatic adenopathy/organomegaly, constitutional symptoms, lymphocyte doubling count <12 mos). The starting dose for lenalidomide is 5mg daily continuously, with 5mg escalations every 28 days to a maximum of 25 mg, and dexamethasone 12 mg daily orally days 1–7, 14, 21 of each 28 day cycle, both to a maximum of 18 cycles. Supportive measures: allopurinol for TLS prophylaxis, DVT prophylaxis with low dose ASA, sulfatrim for PJP prophyaxis. Results: Demographics: To date, 18 pts have been enrolled: median age 61 yrs (range 40–84), male 13 pts (72%), Rai stage III-IV 13 pts (72%), baseline median Hb 98g/L (range 77–137), absolute lymphocytes 194.5 ×109/L (range 9.3–469.9), ß2M 319 nmol/L (range 253–813; normal <170), bulky nodes 15 pts (83%), organomegaly 9 pts (50%), del17p/del11q on FISH 3 pts (17%), ZAP70+ 12 pts (67%) and unmutated IgVH in 9 of 17 pts tested (53%). Seventeen pts have received at least 1 cycle and are evaluable for toxicity and response. The median number of cycles received is 8 (range 1–18). Hematologic toxicity: 9 pts (53%) have developed Gr 3–4 neutropenia during at least 1 cycle; 4 pts (24%) febrile neutropenia; 6 pts (35%) have required GCSF support. Only 2 pts (12%) have developed Gr 3–4 thrombocytopenia, without bleeding. Nonhematologic toxicity: Non-desquamating rash (65%), fatigue (59%), diarrhea (53%), cough (53%), insomnia (47%), and constipation (47%), are common (most grade 1–2). Grade 3–4 toxicities include: atrial fibrillation with pulmonary embolism (1 pt), fatigue (2 pts), insomnia (1 pt), skin rash (1 pt), diarrhea (1 pt), muscle weakness (1 pt), infection (1 pt). Infections are frequent (all grades in 50% of pts, grade 3 in 6%), primarily affecting upper airway/lungs. One pt developed H1N1 influenzae, complicated by aspergillus pneumonia and multiorgan failure. In contrast to the high rate of TF from our previous single-agent lenalidomide trial (88%), TF is considerably less common in the current trial (5 pts; 29%). No TLS has been noted. Dose modifications/study withdrawals: The maximum 25mg dose has been achieved in 4 pts, with a median tolerated daily dose of 15 mg (range 2.5–25 mg). Grade 3–4 neutropenia is the most common cause of dose interruptions/reductions. Responses: All 17 pts have achieved stable disease (SD) or better with overall responses 59%: 9 PR (53%), 7 SD (41%), 1 CR (6%). Responses were reached at a median of 4 months (range 1.8–9.6). No patients have progressed to date. Correlatives: Recent studies have identified cereblon (CRBN) as a direct target of lenalidomide with expression required for anti-tumor activity. CRBN protein was detected by Western blot analysis in CD19-selected cells derived from screening blood samples of all 17 pts evaluated to date and correlation with response is ongoing. Conclusion: Preliminary results from this phase 2 study suggests that lenalidomide plus dexamethasone has significant activity in previously untreated CLL, is generally well-tolerated, and dramatically reduces the incidence of TF symptoms. This may facilitate dose escalation beyond the 10mg daily dose used in our previous single agent study and lead to higher quality responses. Rebound lymphocytosis has not been noted with continuous dosing. Response data are encouraging but whether this combination can achieve durable CR is forthcoming. Disclosures: Chen: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide is not approved for use in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Johnston:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Trudel:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».