Novel Genetic Susceptibility Loci for FEV1 in the Context of Occupational Exposure in Never-Smokers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recently, we identified several novel and plausible genetic susceptibility loci for impaired lung function levels in the context of occupational exposure in a sample, including both never-and ever-smokers (1).Previous studies suggest that effects of genetic variants (2), occupational exposures (3), and their interactions (1) may be different in never-smokers and ever-smokers.Yet never-smokers generally make up a smaller proportion of subjects in general population studies (including current, former, and never-smokers), and effects solely present in never-smokers may therefore not be detected.Hence, to unravel why and how never-smokers develop impaired lung function levels and chronic respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, it is important to study the effects of nonsmoking-related exposures without potential interference of tobacco smoke exposure.With the current genomewide interaction study, we aimed to identify novel genetic susceptibility loci for impaired levels of FEV 1 in the context of occupational exposure to biological dust, mineral dust, and gases/fumes in a sample including never-smokers only.We included never-smokers from two Dutch general population-based cohorts: LifeLines (N = 5,070) and Vlagtwedde-Vlaardingen (N = 431).First, in each cohort separately, genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-by-exposure interactions were assessed, using linear regression models specified as follows: FEV 1 = SNP (additive effect) 1 low exposure 1 high exposure 1 SNP 3 low exposure 1 SNP 3 high exposure 1 sex 1 age 1 height.To have a clear exposure contrast, we focused on the SNP-byhigh exposure interaction only.Subsequently, the SNP-by-high exposure interactions from both cohorts were metaanalyzed using effects estimates weighted by the SEs.SNPs with interaction P values ,5 3 10 28 and with the same direction of interaction in both cohorts were taken further for cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) analysis in lung tissue of 1,087 subjects (4).Finally, we performed pathway analyses using all SNPs (5).More detailed information about the cohorts, phenotyping, genotyping, occupational exposure assessment, cis-eQTL, and pathway analysis can be found elsewhere (1).Subjects included from the LifeLines study had a median age of 46 years (range, 18-90 yr), with a mean FEV 1 of 104% predicted and mean FEV 1 /FVC of 78%.Subjects from the Vlagtwedde-Vlaardingen study had a median age of 54 years (range, 36-79 yr), with a mean FEV 1 of 98% predicted and mean FEV 1 /FVC of 76%.We identified four significant SNP-by-high exposure interactions, one with mineral dust and three with gases/fumes exposure (Table 1).No significant interactions were found with high exposure to biological dust.For all four SNPs, highly exposed subjects had substantially lower FEV 1 levels compared with subjects without exposure, yet only when carrying at least one copy of the risk allele and not when carrying the wild-type genotype (Figures 1A-1D).None of the four identified SNPs was a cis-eQTL in lung tissue.Finally, the Biocarta pathways patched 1 and the natural killer cells were suggestively associated (false discovery rate P value , 0.25) with FEV 1 in the context of mineral dust and gases/fumes exposure, respectively.The most significant interaction identified was between gases/fumes exposure and SNP rs10223081 located nearby the gene NMUR2, a G coupled-protein receptor for neuromedin U (NMU) (6).NMU can induce mast cell degranulation leading to, for example, early-phase inflammation, such as neutrophil infiltration in inflamed sites (7), and can induce eosinophil infiltration in allergic inflammatory sites in an antigen-induced asthma model.We found modest expression of NMUR2 in lung tissue (data not shown), yet this expression was not associated with the identified SNP.Importantly, effects of high exposure on gases/fumes were large and of
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».