MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2521839831 · doi:10.4103/2347-5625.189808

Cancer cachexia and its impact on patient dignity: What nurses need to know

2016· editorial· en· W2521839831 sur OpenAlexaff
Susan McClement

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing · 2016
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePatient Dignity and Privacy
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Manitoba
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPersonhoodDignityMedicineDiseasePalliative careSet (abstract data type)PsychologyNursingEpistemologyLawPhilosophyPolitical sciencePathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Noted physician, Sr. William Osler, is credited with saying, “Care more particularly for the individual patient than for the special features of the disease”. Osler understood that each patient for whom we care is first and foremost a person, who also happens to be living with a particular illness. In addition to understanding the nature of the patient's illness, therefore, it is also critically important that we come to understand the patient's unique story and set of circumstances. Doing so allows us to engage with patients in a way that affirms their sense of dignity and personhood. Drawing on the exemplar of cancer cachexia, this editorial reminds clinicians of the importance of Osler's sage advice to attend to patient dignity and personhood, and provides nurses with direction about how they can do that in practice. Noted physician, Sr. William Osler, is credited with saying, “Care more particularly for the individual patient than for the special features of the disease”. Osler understood that each patient for whom we care is first and foremost a person, who also happens to be living with a particular illness. In addition to understanding the nature of the patient's illness, therefore, it is also critically important that we come to understand the patient's unique story and set of circumstances. Doing so allows us to engage with patients in a way that affirms their sense of dignity and personhood. Drawing on the exemplar of cancer cachexia, this editorial reminds clinicians of the importance of Osler's sage advice to attend to patient dignity and personhood, and provides nurses with direction about how they can do that in practice. Nurses caring for those with advanced malignancies are likely quite familiar with the appearance of patients who have developed cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS). These patients often look like victims of famine-skeletal and frail.1Silverman ME Murray TJ Bryan CS The Quotable Osler. American College of Physicians, Philadelphia2008: 33Google Scholar However, do nurses know how the changes in appearancepatients experience as a result of illness affects their sense of dignity — their sense of being worthy, honored, or esteemed?2McClement S. Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: Psychological effect on the patient and family. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 264–8.Google Scholar Research evidence can help clinicians understand the effect of disease-related variables on patient dignity. A cross-sectional study of 213 terminally ill cancer patients rated their sense of dignity, pain and symptom distress, independence in activities of daily living, quality of life, desire for death, hopelessness, and anxiety. Patients who indicated that loss of dignity was a great concern reported significantly more physical and psychological symptom distress, heightened dependency needs, and loss of will to live. The most significant predictor of a decreased sense of dignity, however, was perceived change in appearance.3Chochinov HM. Dignity.Dignity. Dignity&# 674–5.Google Scholar Given its impact on appearance, individuals with CACS are clearly at risk of having their sense of dignity eroded. What can nurses do to help support patient dignity? We need to be mindful that how patients come to see themselves is very much affected by the nature of the interactions they have with the clinicians who care for them.4Chochinov HM, Hack T, Hassard T, Kristjanson LJ, McClement S, Harlos M. Dignity in the terminally ill: A cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet 2026–30.Google Scholar Research speaks to the need to be sensitive to issues of privacy, communicate respectfully, and reassure patients that they are not a burden to care for.5Chochinov HM. Dignity and the essence of medicine: The A, B, C, and D of dignity conserving care. BMJ 184–7.Google Scholar, 6Chochinov HM, Hack T, McClement S, Kristjanson L, Harlos M. Dignity in the terminally ill: A developing empirical model. Soc Sci Med 433–43.Google Scholar, 7McClement SE, Chochinov HM, Hack TF, Kristjanson LJ, Harlos M. Dignity-conserving care: Application of research findings to practice. Int J Palliat Nurs 173–9.Google Scholar We need to acknowledge the patient as a person not merely a disease. To accomplish this, nurse scan ask the patient dignity question (PDQ): “What would you want any staff member walking in this room to know about you as a person?” Research has been conducted examining the impact of this question on patients and families, and its influence on health care providers (HCPs). Chochinov et al. invited 66 palliative care in-patients and 60 family members to respond to the PDQ.8Chochinov HM McClement S Hack T Thompson G Dufault B Harlos M Eliciting personhood within clinical practice: Effects on patients, families, and health care providers.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015; 49: 974-80e2Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar After summarizing the responses and ensuring their accuracy, permission was requested to place the answers to the PDQ on patients' charts. The majority of patients and families (93%) felt that the information was important for HCPs to know and 99% recommended the PDQ for others. A total of 137 HCPs completed evaluations of 293 individual patient PDQ summaries. The PDQ summaries taught HCPs things they didn't know about the patient (90%), affected them emotionally (64%), and influenced their sense of empathy (59%) and their care (44%).8Chochinov HM McClement S Hack T Thompson G Dufault B Harlos M Eliciting personhood within clinical practice: Effects on patients, families, and health care providers.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015; 49: 974-80e2Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar Bolstering patient dignity by attending to personhood is neither expensive nor time-consuming. It requires a willingness to transcend impersonal routinized approaches to care so that patients feel valued, respected, and cared for. Is not that what nursing is all about?

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,268
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,395
Écart entre enseignants0,369 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAsia-Pacific Journal of Oncology NursingMême sujetPatient Dignity and PrivacyTravaux en français237 207