MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2523611938 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.500.500

Genetic Alterations In Immune Cell Crosstalk Genes In Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Predict Survival

2013· article· en· W2523611938 sur OpenAlexaff
Daisuke Ennishi, Fong Chun Chan, David W. Scott, Christoffer Hother, Barbara Meissner, Merrill Boyle, Ryan D. Morin, Laurie H. Sehn, Marco A. Marra, Joseph M. Connors, Christian Steidl, Randy D. Gascoyne

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaBiologyLymphomaProportional hazards modelCancer researchOncologyMedicineImmunologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoma subtype accounting for ∼40% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Although R-CHOP has significantly improved outcome in DLBCL, 35% of patients still experience relapsed/refractory disease. Further investigation into the genomic architecture of DLBCL is needed to determine the biological correlates that underlie treatment failure. Immune cell signatures have been shown to impact survival in DLBCL (Lenz et al, NEJM 2008). Recurrent mutations and/or copy number alterations (CNAs) in genes that impact the tumor's immune-cell crosstalk have recently been described, but their clinical impact is unknown. Moreover, mutations and copy-number loss involving genes that foster immune escape has been implicated as a dominant oncogenic mechanism in DLBCL (Challa-Malladi et al, Can Cell 2011). We sought to determine the relationship between genetic alterations involving immune-cell crosstalk pathways and survival in a cohort of DLBCL patients treated with R-CHOP. Methods Following our initial analysis of 91 whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) including 40 with whole genome sequencing, we validated SNVs in the genes of interest by Sanger sequencing in the tumor and matched germline DNAs if available. RNA-seq-derived gene expression data were also used to determine the cell of origin (COO) distinction. Affymetrix SNP 6.0 microarrays were used to ascertain the CNAs in all 91 DLBCL samples. Clinical outcome correlations were analyzed by Cox regression and the log-rank test in the 82 patients treated with R-CHOP (median follow-up; 82 months). Results Using next-generation sequencing, we identified 97 SNVs in 16 genes (B2M, CD274, CD276, CD58, CD83, CIITA, NLRC4, NLRC5, RFXAP, RFXANK, TNFRSF14, TNFRSF25, TNFSF9, TAP1, TAP2 and TAPBP) that were selected based on an extensive literature review implicating these genes in immune-cell crosstalk pathways in DLBCL. Among them, eight genes were mutated in more than one case including B2M (7%), CD58 (7%), TNFRSF14 (7%), CIITA (4%), TNFSF9 (2%), NLRC5 (3%), CD83 (11%), and RFXAP (2%). These eight loci were further analyzed for CNAs, gene expression and outcome correlations. SNP 6.0 microarrays revealed either focal heterozygous or homozygous deletions in B2M (22%), CD58 (14%), TNFSF9 (10%), and heterozygous deletions in TNFRSF14 (12%), CIITA (3%), NLRC5 (7%), CD83 (2%), and RFXAP (7%). Amongst the 91 cases, 35 cases (38%) had no genetic aberration. 56 cases (62%) had at least one aberration, while 29 (32%) had multiple genetic aberrations indicating that genetic aberrations associated with immune-cell crosstalk are not mutually exclusive in DLBCL. Mutations and CNAs were not COO specific, with the exception of TNFRSF14, which was significantly restricted to the GCB-subtype (p=0.001). We evaluated outcome correlations for each genetic aberrations in the 82 cases with uniform therapy, including two recognized major histocompatibility class (MHC) groups; MHC class I (B2M and NLRC5) and MHC class II (CIITA, RFXAP and CD83). In univariate analysis, the presence of genetic aberrations in the MHCI group and NLRC5 individually were prognostic (5yr PFS, 59% vs 78%, p=0.025, 44% vs 77%, p=0.005, respectively), but not the MHCII group or other individual loci. In subgroup analyses according to COO, both MHCI and MHCII genetic aberrations were associated with inferior 5yr PFS in the ABC subtype (MHCI, 27% vs 79%, p<0.0001) (MHCII, 40% vs 68%, p=0.018), but not in GCB. We next assessed the prognostic impact of the total number of genetic hits and revealed that patients with at least one genetic hit had a 5yr OS and PFS of 65% and 57%, respectively, while those with no genetic hit had a 5yr OS and PFS of 100% and 97%, respectively (both comparisons, p<0.0001). In a Cox model of PFS including IPI and COO, any genetic hit in immune-cell crosstalk pathways remained strongly predictive (HR=15.1 [2.0-113.2], p= 0.008) and was independent of both IPI (HR= 2.1 [1.1-4.0], p= 0.030) and COO (HR= 0.6 [0.3-1.4], p=0.26). Conclusions Recurrent genetic alterations involving genes related to immune-cell crosstalk in DLBCL are frequent (56%), co-occur and independently contribute to outcome in patients treated with R-CHOP. MHCI and MHCII perturbations are only prognostic in the ABC subtype. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,214 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→