Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hybrid electro-electroless deposition (HEED) is a novel thin film metal deposition technique that combines electroplating and electroless deposition within a single electrolyte. The hybridization of HEED is the result of each deposition process targeting a distinct metal ion, or combination of ions, for reduction. The nature of the deposit is determined by the composition, pH, and temperature of the electrolyte as well as the electroplating potential applied; all of which affect the relative deposition rate of each process. Composite, alloyed, or compositionally modulated layered deposits can all readily be formed using HEED. This work details advancements in controlling the composition and production of both HEED alloys and multi-layers. HEED alloys are produced by using electroplating to either preferentially deposit one component of the electroless alloy, or including a new metal into the electroless deposit. The deposition of Zn enhanced Ni-Zn-P HEED alloys, representing the former case, is shown in connection to the production of corrosion resistant coatings. The electroless process produces coatings over the entire surface while electroplating provides increased Zn content in electroplated regions. The formation of concentration gradients within the coating provides control over where corrosion is most likely to occur. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to determine an increase in Zn content from 26% using electroless deposition to 50% using HEED [1]. The process was carried out on both Cu substrate and Mg alloy substrates. Compositionally modulated HEED, or multi-layer HEED, deposits are produced in a similar fashion to traditionally electroplated multi-layer deposits by modulating the applied deposition potential [1, 2]. Provided appropriate conditions and ion choice, slowing the electroless deposition rate minimizes inclusion of the electroless alloy or metal. With HEED, metals of similar nobility, such as Ni and Co, can be deposited in a multi-layered arrangement [2]. In the multi-layered configuration Ni-P is electrolessly deposited while Co is reduced using electroplating. The atomic composition of the electroless Ni-P layers, tested on Sn/Pd treated glass, was consistently 76% Ni, 22% P, with no more than 2% Co [2], consistent with Ni3P. Within an acidic electrolyte the electroless Ni-P layers are effectively free of Co while the purity of electroplated Co layers is dependent on the electroless deposition rate and relative Co2+ ion availability in solution. Adjusting the pH to the alkaline regime results in alloying of each layer as Co is co-deposited in the electroless deposition phase. Figure 1 shows the competition between Co electroplating and electroless Ni-P deposition at low current density 0.95 A∙dm-2 on a Cu substrate [2]. The low current density slows electroplating while the temperature promotes hastened electroless deposition. The resulting deposit is a composite of each distinct process with the electroless deposition material, EDS Spot 1, and electroplated material, EDS Spot 2, shown to have distinct structures and composition. Increasing the current density to 3.8 A∙dm-2 produces homogeneous alloys as electroplating becomes the dominant process. Lowering the temperature of the electrolyte further increases the dominance of electroplating. [1] Robert Petro and Mordechay Schlesinger, “Development of Hybrid Electro-Electroless Deposit (HEED) Coatings and Applications”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 161(10), (2014), p.D1-D6 [2] Robert Petro and Mordechay Schlesinger, “Deposition of Cobalt-Nickel Hybrid Electro-Electroless Deposited (HEED) Modulated Multilayers”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 162(4), (2015), p.D154-D158 Figure 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».