Oral Anticoagulation Treatment and Persistence After Venous Thromboembolism In a Real World Population: The Q-VTE Study Cohort
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background For patients who are diagnosed with venous thromboembolism (VTE) provoked by transient risk factors, clinical guidelines typically recommend 3 months of oral anticoagulation, with longer treatment considered for unprovoked VTE. Describing treatment patterns of VTE in a real world population may identify remedial gaps in patient care. Aim We aimed to characterize oral anticoagulant treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) following incident VTE and assess persistence of VKA therapy in patients with provoked vs. unprovoked VTE in a real world setting. Methods We used the linked administrative healthcare databases of the province of Québec, Canada, including the hospitalization, universal healthcare services, and out-patient prescription databases. We identified all beneficiaries with an incident DVT or PE between 2000 and 2009, which we classified as definite or probable VTE using a priori determined diagnostic algorithms based on ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CA diagnosis codes. We formed two patient cohorts, one with definite and the other including definite or probable first-time VTE, that were followed until death or end of study (December 31, 2009). Anticoagulant out-patient prescription patterns were analyzed for both patient cohorts. Results From 245,452 Québec residents between 2000 and 2009 with at least 1 VTE diagnosis in RAMQ or MED-ÉCHO, we formed the definite VTE cohort including 40,776 definite cases and the any VTE cohort consisting of 54,803 definite or probable cases. From the 40,776 patients with a first definite VTE, there were 24,860 patients with DVT alone (61%) and 15,916 with PE with or without DVT (39%). Furthermore, there were 78% of patients over the age of 60 and 58.3% of patients were women. In all, 8,998 (22.1%) patients had an unprovoked VTE event while 19,010 (46.6%) patients had a provoked non-cancer event. Similar findings were found in the any VTE cohort. Among definite VTE cohort patients with a provoked non-cancer VTE, 68.6% of patients received anticoagulation after the VTE event. Most were dispensed VKA (64.9%) and 23.9% received a prescription for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Among patients with an unprovoked VTE, 86.3% of patients were prescribed anticoagulation (84.5% used VKA and 39.9% used LMWH). Overall, a greater number of patients received anticoagulation following PE (85.2%) than DVT alone (66.2%). Results were similar in the any VTE cohort. Persistence with VKA therapy among patients with provoked VTE was 86.9% at 90 days, 59.5% at 180 days and 19.9% at 365 days. Treatment persistence for patients with unprovoked non-cancer VTE was 88.8%, 66.8% and 22.9% for 90, 180 and 365 days, respectively. Similar findings were found in the any VTE cohort. Conclusions Our study provides useful information on VTE management in a real world population. Treatment persistence was similar for patients with provoked and unprovoked VTE. VKA therapy duration after provoked VTE was longer than the recommended 3 months, whereas treatment was shorter than suggested in patients with unprovoked VTE. Further investigation is needed to determine reasons for non-adherence to clinical guidelines. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».