MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2524196805

Epistemic shifts of author commitment in Darwin’s six editions of On the Origin of Species

2012· article· en· W2524196805 sur OpenAlex
Heidi Verplaetse, Jelle Calders

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueLirias (KU Leuven) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEvolution and Science Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDarwin (ADL)Origin of speciesEpistemologyPhilosophyComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Epistemic shifts of author commitment in Darwin’s six editions of On the Origin of Species Heidi Verplaetse, Lessius/KULeuven Jelle Calders, Lessius/KULeuven Following earlier research into the expression and frequency of epistemic modality in Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (cf. Crismore and Farnsworth 1989) and research on the translation of epistemic modality in this groundbreaking work of scientific literature (cf. Brisset 2002, Algoet 2008 and Vandepitte et al. 2011), the current paper investigates the modal epistemic shifts which Darwin himself introduced in the six different editions of his account. The aim of this investigation is twofold: (i) the primary purpose is to track and describe the author’s evolving commitment to his novel and controversial ideas on evolutionary biology, (ii) secondly, the findings of this analysis may serve two educational linguistic purposes, viz. to illustrate the usage of modal expressions in general foreign language acquisition, but mostly for teaching the value and scientific implications regarding degrees of certainty and objectivity in academic writing to undergraduate students as well as science writers from different disciplines (ESP). By using and adapting these epistemic markers of author commitment Darwin also entered into a dialogue with his readers, cautiously drawing them into the acceptation of his novel and controversial ideas, for instance, by means of mental predicates such as “I am doubtfully inclined to believe"?. In addition to expressing author commitment, modality markers thus also serve the purpose of engaging the reader in a dialogue, as Hyland (2005) points out. The corpus data for analysing modal epistemic shifts are based on the Online Variorum of Darwin's On the Origin of Species. This Variorum offers an aligned representation of the six British editions of the account written by Darwin, covering the time span between 1859 and 1872. The analysis will cover chapter four, which presents the theory of natural selection. A systemic-functional approach will be used, following Halliday (1994) and Halliday and Matthiessen (2004). This approach includes expressions of epistemic modality from different word classes, viz. mental state predicates (e.g. I believe), modal auxiliaries, modal adverbs (cf. also Hoye 1997) and modal adjectives. The methodology for the analysis involves listing epistemic shifts between the six different subsequent versions respectively, as well as a comparison of the original and final versions. The latter finding will yield an indication of the general evolution in the author’s commitment to his scientific ideas. In order to evaluate this the following factors will form the basis of a formulaic assessment: degree of probability (7 degrees), degree of objectivity as a factor of implicit versus explicit modality and objective versus subjective modality. The overall degree of certainty will be assessed as the result of the former degrees of probability and objectivity. It is expected that the overall epistemic shift will show an increasingly more confident author, as tentative and subjective scientific ideas receive a more objective and certain rendering (e.g. “some species might become extinct"? (1859: 81) cp. “some species will probably become extinct"? (1872). References Algoet, B. (2008). Two Dutch Translations of Charles Darwin’s ‘On the Origin of Species’: expressions of epistemic modality in chapter four. Unpublished Masters Dissertartion. Hogeschool Gent. Brisset, A. (2002) ‘Clémence Royer, ou Darwin en colère’ (Clémence Royer, or an Angry Darwin), in Jean Delisle (ed.) Portraits de traductrices (Portraits of Women Translators), Ottawa: Les Presses de l’Université d’Ottawa, 173-203. Crismore, A. and R. Farnsworth (1989)."?Mr. Darwin and his readers: Exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos"?. Rhetoric Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, Fall 1989, 91-112. Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. 1st edition, 1st issue. Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London/New York/Sydney/Auckland: Arnold. First published London: Arnold [1985]. Halliday, M.A.K. and C.M.I.M. Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third, Revised Edition. London: Arnold. Hoye, L. (1997). Adverbs and Modality in English. London: Longman. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing. London / New York: Continuum. Vandepitte, S. Vandenbussche, L. and B. Algoet (2011). “Travelling Certainties: Darwin’s Doubts and Their Dutch Translations."? The Translator, Vol. 17, No. 2 . Special Issue: Science in Translation, 275-299. Corpus: Bordalejo, B. (ed.), Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing, University of Birmingham: Online Variorum: http://darwin-online.org.uk/Variorum/index.html [accessed 2011-12-5]

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,920
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,146
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,161 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle