MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2524856408 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.3337

Virginia Ruth Brown

2016· article· en· W2524856408 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. M. Bernstein, R. Redwine, Benjamin F. Gibson, S. J. Seestrom

Notice bibliographique

RevuePhysics Today · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueNuclear Physics and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNational laboratoryNuclear physicsPhysicsNeutronNuclear weaponNucleonEngineering physics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Virginia Ruth Brown died on 8 February 2016 in Chevy Chase, Maryland, after a long battle with cancer. She was a wonderful colleague, friend, and distinguished theoretical nuclear physicist. During her long career, Virginia made important contributions to our understanding of the nucleon–nucleon interaction, nuclear reaction theory, and nuclear structure, among other accomplishments. She loved physics and had a deep commitment to getting to the heart of things.Virginia Ruth BrownPPT|High resolutionBorn on 11 March 1934 in Massachusetts, Virginia received her PhD, under the supervision of Bernard Margolis, from McGill University in 1964. She was a postdoctoral fellow at Yale University and then worked at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) from 1964 until 1995. She was an NSF program officer for nuclear theory from 1995 to 1998. Following that, she was a visiting professor in the physics department of the University of Maryland in College Park and a visiting scientist in the Laboratory for Nuclear Science at MIT.During Virginia’s early work on nucleon–nucleon bremsstrahlung, she explored the effects of parity nonconservation and demonstrated the importance of meson exchange in neutron–proton bremsstrahlung. Her calculations showed that meson exchange currents contributed a factor of 2 and were not dominated by one-pion exchange. Throughout her career she continued refining and extending her calculations, including for relativistic effects and noncoplanarity. She compared her results with experiment, most notably with the data on neutron–proton bremsstrahlung that Stephen Wender, June Matthews, and their colleagues obtained at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center. When Virginia was at MIT she interacted frequently with Matthews’s group and directed the research of several of Matthews’s undergraduate and graduate students.Virginia’s collaboration with experimentalists started soon after she joined LLNL; most prominently, she worked with John Anderson on charge-exchange reactions in nuclei.Around 1973 Virginia also began her long partnership with theorist Victor Madsen. They developed the nuclear-structure and reaction theory needed to understand charge-exchange reactions; their breakthroughs included a model for mixing giant resonance states with the low-lying states that had been experimentally observed at the time. Their most important contribution was the systematic inclusion of isospin degrees of freedom that were required to understand the data. It was successfully applied to inelastic scattering processes without any additional modifications.One of us (Bernstein) remembers how stimulating it was to work with Virginia. In the mid 1970s, he received a letter from her about how Madsen’s and her isospin-dependence calculations could explain the puzzles and regularities that he had observed in inelastic alpha-particle scattering. Their collaboration started in their first meeting, and over many years it yielded a productive series of papers. They covered electromagnetic tests of the accuracy of the observed neutron and proton transition matrix elements and their observation using different hadronic probes and electromagnetic methods such as electron scattering and Coulomb excitation. He remembers with great pleasure his annual spring-break trip to the University of California, Berkeley, and LLNL to work with Virginia and to enjoy great dinners with her in Berkeley and San Francisco. Their friendship and collaboration were reinforced while she was working as a visiting scientist at MIT from 1998 until her death.Virginia was a deeply involved member of the American Physical Society (APS), including as secretary/treasurer of the division of nuclear physics (DNP) from 1986 to 1995. Because of her numerous contributions, her colleagues chose her in 2003 to receive the division’s first Distinguished Service Award.Another of us (Gibson) saw firsthand Virginia’s remarkable contributions to APS. He first met Virginia when he was a postdoctoral fellow at LLNL in 1968. Their closest connection came through the DNP, when he succeeded her as secretary/treasurer in 1995, and she mentored him in that time-consuming position.Virginia’s efforts as part of the DNP leadership strengthened the division’s fall meetings, assisted in funding APS’s Hans Bethe and Herman Feshbach Prizes and the division’s Nuclear Physics Dissertation Award, initiated the Department of Energy and NSF’s Nuclear Science Advisory Committee Long Range Plan town meetings, and established the DNP archive and historical record.While at NSF, Virginia suggested exploring a joint meeting with the nuclear physicists of the Physical Society of Japan. She chaired the first of the resulting series of successful international physics meetings in 2001 and remained instrumental in their success through the 2014 joint meeting. After Virginia left NSF, she was a visiting scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, where she conducted research and shared meals with Gibson and another of us (Seestrom). During one visit, she and Gibson drafted a history of the DNP. Virginia’s imprint on the division is indelible, and the DNP owes her a great debt of gratitude.With her contagious enthusiasm and laughter, Virginia was a dear friend who will be sorely missed.© 2016 American Institute of Physics.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,560
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePhysics TodayMême sujetNuclear Physics and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207