Social Enterprise Gains Momentum/Les Entreprises Sociales Prennent Leur Envol
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The 2013 Social Enterprise World Forum (SEWF 2013) in Calgary will from October 2-4, 2013 bring together 1,200 individuals from more than 30 countries and speakers from more than 20 countries. Attendees will come from diverse backgrounds - social enterprise practitioners from all sectors, traditional non-profits, for-profit businesses, philanthropists, entrepreneurs, the public sector, support agencies, funders and investors, consultants, indigenous groups, and students - but all share a dedication to resolving the world's most complex and confounding social challenges. See: http://www .socialenterpriseworldforum.org/ .SEWF 2013 will focus on six program tracks:1. Social Finance/Impact Investing;2. Indigenous Social Enterprise;3. Social Enterprise Skills Building;4. Research and Public Policy;5. Cross-Boundary Collaboration;6. Social Innovation.Each session will be recorded and posted online so that the discussions and insights can be consulted again and again by everyone dedicated to the advancement of social enterprise.To complement the practitioner-focused SEWF, Peter Elson of Mount Royal University and Peter Hall of Simon Fraser University are organizing a SEWF Preconference Research Day on October 1 at Mount Royal University. The research day will explore the multiple connections between social-enterprise research and practice.This watershed event in Canada reflects a socialenterprise movement that is gaining momentum across the country, catching up in many respects to the flagship developments that have been taking place in Quebec since the mid-1990s. British Columbia and Nova Scotia have introduced Community Interest Corporation (CIC) legislation; other provinces are exploring social impact bonds, loan guarantees, and training and incubation programs. Enterprising Non-Profits (enp), launched in Vancouver in 1997, has now expanded to five affiliates in Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario (2), and Nova Scotia. See: http://www.enterprisingnonprofits.ca/.On the research side of the equation, the fiveyear social-economy Community-University Research Alliance (CURA, 2005-2011) certainly explored social enterprises to one degree or another, and a current CURA at the Social Economy Centre at the University of Toronto has a dedicated focus on social enterprise. See: http://socialeconomycentre.ca/. Peter Elson and Peter Hall have conducted province-wide socialenterprise surveys in five provinces, and more are in the planning stages. See: www.sess.ca.There are also research centres dedicated to social enterprise, such as the Sprott Centre for Social Enterprises (SCSE) at Carleton University, and similar centres at Queen's University, McGill University and the University of Victoria, to name a few. Continuing in this trend, the university programs developed by some researchers interested in social enterprises provide training for students as well as outreach training and educational opportunities for nonprofit community groups.In March 2013, the Government of Quebec, ahead of the curve in many dimensions of the social economy, filed a draftframework law, Bill 27: Social Economy Act, to recognize the contribution of the social economy to Quebec's socioeconomic development. This bill will designate the role of government in this area, promote social-economy enterprises, and support the latter in their growth through the development or adaptation of intervention tools and strategies. Establishing general principles, the framework law will help integrate the social economy in development activities. An action plan should be available by April 1, 2014.ANSERJ would like to invite you to contribute to this growing momentum by submitting an article on social enterprise for the Fall 2013 issue. Ideally, submissions should be received before the end of June. As has been clearly demonstrated, research is a critical component in fostering sound practices and innovations. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».