MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2525072188 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.2732.2732

Engage - a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Eliglustat in Adults with Gaucher Disease Type 1: Results after 18 Months

2014· article· en· W2525072188 sur OpenAlexaff
Dominick Amato, Majed Dasouki, Seymour Packman, Gregory M. Pastores, Sarit Assouline, Manisha Balwani, Pramod K. Mistry, Andres Ortega, Suma P. Shankar, María Helena Solano, Leorah Ross, Jennifer Angell, Judith Peterschmitt

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalMount Sinai Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineClinical endpointPlaceboAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialDouble blindSurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Eliglustat, a ceramide analogue, is a novel, oral substrate-reduction therapy in development for Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1). We present 18-month results from ENGAGE (NCT00891202), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase-3 trial (sponsored by Genzyme, a Sanofi company, Cambridge, MA) investigating the efficacy and safety of eliglustat in untreated adults with GD1. Methods: During the primary analysis period (PAP), 40 patients (mean age: 31.8 years; 20 males) with splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia and/or anemia were randomized 1:1 to receive eliglustat (50 or 100 mg BID depending on plasma levels) or placebo for 9 months and then entered a 9-month, open-label extension phase in which all patients received eliglustat. The primary efficacy endpoint was percent change in spleen volume (multiples of normal). Secondary endpoints included changes in hemoglobin levels, liver volume, and platelet counts. Bone efficacy endpoints included changes in bone marrow burden (BMB) scores, total bone mineral density (BMD), and T- and Z-scores. Results: In the 9-month PAP, eliglustat was superior to placebo in all primary and secondary endpoints; no patients discontinued due to an adverse event. For 18 of 20 patients who received 18 months of eliglustat, mean improvements from baseline continued (spleen: -45%, hemoglobin: +1.02 g/dL; liver: -11%; platelets: +58%). For 20 of 20 patients previously receiving placebo for 9 months who then crossed-over to eliglustat during the extension phase, mean improvements after 9 months of eliglustat were consistent with what was seen in the PAP in the eliglustat-treated patients: spleen: -31%; hemoglobin: +0.79 g/dL; liver: -7.3%; and platelets: +40%. During the PAP, BMB scores, indicating bone marrow infiltration, decreased in eliglustat patients and were unchanged in placebo patients; changes in total BMD and in T- and Z-scores showed a positive trend with eliglustat compared with placebo, although changes were not statistically significant. Eliglustat-treated patients showed continued improvements in bone parameters during the 9-month extension period. No new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion: ENGAGE met its primary and secondary efficacy endpoints in the PAP. Placebo cross-over patients showed improvements during the extension period similar to the eliglustat-treated patients during the PAP. Patients in the eliglustat-treatment group showed continued improvements in the first 9 months of the extension phase. Disclosures Amato: Protalix-Pfizer: Consultancy, travel reimbursement, advisory board fees, travel reimbursement, advisory board fees Other; Actelion: Consultancy, Honoraria, travel reimbursement, advisory board fees, travel reimbursement, advisory board fees Other; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, travel reimbursement, advisory board fees, travel reimbursement, advisory board fees Other; Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel reimbursement Other. Off Label Use: Eliglustat is an investigational drug for the treatment of Gaucher disease type 1. Dasouki:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Travel reimbursement Other. Packman:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel reimbursement Other. Pastores:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel reimbursement Other. Balwani:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel reimbursement Other. Mistry:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel reimbursement, Research grants Other. Shankar:Biomarin: Consultancy, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings , received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings Other; Protalix-Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel reimbursement, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings, Travel reimbursement, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings Other; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel reimbursement, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings, Travel reimbursement, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings Other; Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel reimbursement, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings Other; Actelion: Consultancy, received funds for fellowship training, for educational and patient meetings Other. Solano:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Travel reimbursement Other. Ross:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Employment. Angell:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Employment. Peterschmitt:Genzyme, a Sanofi Company: Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207