MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2526347762 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.808.808

MMSET/WHSC1 Enhances DNA Damage Repair Leading To An Increase In Resistance To Chemotherapeutic Agents

2013· article· en· W2526347762 sur OpenAlexaff
Mrinal Y. Shah, Eva E. Martinez, Relja Popovic, Teresa Ezponda, Eliza C. Small, Christine Will, Paola Neri, Nizar J. Bahlis, Jonathan D. Licht

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiologyDNA damageHistoneDNA repairGene knockdownDNA repair protein XRCC4Cancer researchChromatinHistone methyltransferaseMethyltransferaseMolecular biologyCell biologyDNACell cultureNucleotide excision repairMethylationGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract MMSET/WHSC1 is a histone methyltransferase (HMT) overexpressed in t(4;14)+ multiple myeloma (MM) patients, and is believed to be the driving factor in the pathogenesis of this subtype of MM. Overexpression of MMSET also occurs in solid cancers, including neuroblastoma, colon and prostate. MMSET overexpression in MM and prostate cells leads to an increase in histone 3 lysine 36 dimethylation (H3K36me2), and a decrease in histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). This altered epigenetic landscape is accompanied by changes in proliferation, gene expression, and chromatin accessibility. Prior work linked methylation of histones, including H3K36, to the ability of cells to undergo DNA damage repair. In addition, t(4;14)+ patients frequently relapse after regimens that include DNA damage-inducing agents, suggesting that MMSET might play a role in DNA damage repair and response. To investigate the role of MMSET in DNA damage repair, we transfected U2OS cells with a linearized vector expressing a neomycin-resistant gene. In the presence of G418, only cells that are able to integrate this plasmid through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) can survive. siRNA knockdown of MMSET led to a decrease in cell survival, suggesting that MMSET is necessary for efficient DNA repair. We also used U2OS cells engineered to express the AsiSI enzyme fused to an estrogen receptor hormone-binding domain. Upon tamoxifen treatment, double strand breaks (DSBs) are induced at multiple AsiSI recognition sites, accompanied by an increase in γH2AX foci. The extent of repair after AsiSI-induced damage was ascertained by the ability of a DNA fragment that spans a specific cut site to be PCR amplified. With MMSET knockdown, there was a >10 fold increase in unrepaired DNA. ChIP analysis showed that with the depletion of MMSET, γH2AX persisted at the cut site. ChIP for specific effectors of DNA damage showed a marked decrease of recruitment of CtIP and RAD51 to the DSB. However, immunoblot analysis showed that CtIP and RAD51 levels were drastically decreased with MMSET depletion, thus explaining the loss of their recruitment to DSBs. In contrast, XRCC4 levels were maintained with MMSET siRNA, but its recruitment to the DSB decreased. CtIP is important for both NHEJ and homologous recombination (HR), RAD51 is critical for HR, and XRCC4 is necessary for NHEJ, suggesting that MMSET is important in multiple pathways of DNA repair. To study the effect of MMSET in MM, we used the t(4;14)+ KMS11 cell line, NTKO, and genetically matched TKO cells in which the overexpressed MMSET allele was knocked out. NTKO cells have elevated levels of DNA damage at baseline, as measured by a comet assay and by the presence of elevated numbers of 53BP1-positive foci. Upon addition of the DNA damaging agent melphalan, NTKO cells showed increased damage as measured by an increase in the tail moment by the comet assay. Paradoxically, upon treatment of these cells with the DNA damaging agents, NTKO cells survived better than TKO cells. NTKO repaired DNA damage at an enhanced rate and continued to proliferate after a significant DNA damage insult, whereas TKO cells accumulated DNA damage and entered cell cycle arrest. We repleted TKO cells with constructs expressing either wild-type MMSET or an HMT-dead (Y1118A) isoform. Upon treatment, cells expressing the wild-type MMSET have showed enhanced DNA repair and continued proliferation after DNA damage, whereas cells expressing the HMT-dead protein repaired DNA damage more slowly and entered cell cycle arrest. The HMT activity of MMSET was critical for the induction of expression of genes required for multiple DNA repair pathways including CHEK2, DDB2, DDIT3, RAD51, and MRE11, again suggesting that MMSET modulates DNA repair by affecting expression of critical components of the repair machinery. The clinical relevance of these finds becomes more apparent in vivo. Luciferase-tagged KMS11 cells harboring doxycycline-inducible MMSET shRNA were injected into nude mice. After one week, mice were treated with doxycycline and injected with melphalan or saline. Knockdown of MMSET or melphalan treatment alone decreased tumor growth but eventually all mice had progressive disease. Only when MMSET was knocked down and chemotherapy given were the mice rendered tumor free. These findings indicate a new mechanism for the ability of MMSET to enhance DNA repair and identify the protein as a potential therapeutic target in MM and other cancers. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,275
Écart entre enseignants0,262 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→Travaux en français237 207→