MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2526609389 · doi:10.1002/etc.3003

Letter to the Editor

2015· letter· en· W2526609389 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Trudy Watson‐Leung, Kim Mahon, David G. Poirier, Richard Chong-Kit, Lisa M. Kennedy, Melanie Appleton

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Établissements canadiensEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaMinistry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChristian ministryWatsonClimate changeEnvironmental ethicsLibrary sciencePolitical scienceGeographyEcologyArtificial intelligencePhilosophyComputer scienceLawBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVolume 34, Issue 7 p. 1460-1462 Letter to the Editor Letter to the Editor Trudy L. Watson-Leung, Trudy L. Watson-Leung Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorKim A. Mahon, Kim A. Mahon Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorDavid G. Poirier, David G. Poirier Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorRichard Chong-Kit, Richard Chong-Kit Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorLisa Kennedy, Lisa Kennedy Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorMelanie Appleton, Melanie Appleton Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author Trudy L. Watson-Leung, Trudy L. Watson-Leung Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorKim A. Mahon, Kim A. Mahon Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorDavid G. Poirier, David G. Poirier Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorRichard Chong-Kit, Richard Chong-Kit Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorLisa Kennedy, Lisa Kennedy Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorMelanie Appleton, Melanie Appleton Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 26 June 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3003Citations: 5Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Harwood AD, Rothert AK, Lydy MJ. 2014. Using Hexagenia in sediment bioassays: Methods, applicability, and relative sensitivity. Environ Toxicol Chem 33: 868–874. 2Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2012. Hexagenia spp. test for survival and growth in sediment. Method E3444 version 6.0. Ottawa, ON, Canada. 3 Bedard D, Hayton A, Persaud D. 1992. Ontario Ministry of the Environment laboratory sediment biological testing protocol. PIBS 2067E. Queen's Printer for Ontario, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 4 Reynoldson TB, Bailey RC, Day KE, Norris RH. 1995. Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on BEnthic Assessment of SedimenT (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological state. Aust J Ecol 20: 198–219. 5Environment Canada and Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2007. Canada–Ontario decision-making framework for assessment of Great Lakes contaminated sediment. PIBS 6223e. Ottawa, ON, Canada. 6US Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Methods for measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates. EPA 600/R-99/064. Washington, DC. 7Environment Canada. 1997. Biological test method: Test for survival and growth in sediment using larvae of freshwater midges (Chironomus tentans or Chironomus riparius). EPS1/RM/32. Ottawa, ON, Canada. 8Environment Canada. 2013. Biological test method: Test for survival and growth in sediment and water using the freshwater amphipod Hyalella azteca. EPS 1/RM/33. Ottawa, ON, Canada. 9 Milani D, Reynoldson TB, Borgmann U, Kolasa J. 2003. The relative sensitivity of four benthic invertebrates to metals in spiked-sediment exposures and application to contaminated sediment. Environ Toxicol Chem 22: 845–854. 10 Dermott R. 1981. Ingestion rate of the burrowing mayfly Hexagenia limbata as determined with 14C. Hydrobiologia 83: 499–503. 11 Winter A, Ciborowski JJH, Reynoldson TB. 1996. Effects of chronic hypoxia and reduced temperature on survival and growth of burrowing mayflies, Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53: 1565–1571. 12 Henry MG, Chester GN, Mauck WL. 1986. Role of artificial burrows in Hexagenia toxicity tests: Recommendations for protocol development. Environ Toxicol Chem 5: 553–559. 13 Fremling CR. 1967. Methods for mass-rearing Hexagenia mayflies (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). Trans Am Fish Soc 96: 407–410. 14 Ciborowski JJH, Hanes EC, Corkum LD. 1990. Standardized rearing materials and procedures for Hexagenia, a benthic aquatic bioassay organism. Proceedings, Ontario Ministry of the Environment Technology Transfer Conference on Environmental Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, November, 19–20, 1990, pp 374–382. 15 Corkum LD, Ciborowski JJH, Poulin RG. 1997. Effects of emergence date and maternal size on egg development and sizes of eggs and first-instar nymphs of a semelparous aquatic insect. Oecologia 111: 69–75. 16 Bustos C, Corkum LD. 2013. Delayed egg hatching accounts for replacement of burrowing mayflies Hexagenia rigida by Hexagenia limbata after recolonization in western Lake Erie. J Gt Lakes Res 39: 168–172. 17 Corkum LD, Hanes EC. 1991. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on larval size and survivorship of a burrowing mayfly (Ephemeroptera, Ephemeridae). Can J Zool 70: 256–263. 18 Hanes EC, Ciborowski JJH. 1992. Effects of density and food limitation on size variation and mortality of larval Hexagenia rigida (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). Can J Zool 70: 1824–1832. 19 Drouillard KE, Ciborowski JJH, Haffner GD, Lazar R. 1996. Estimation of the uptake of organochlorines by the mayfly Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). J Gt Lakes Res 22: 26–35. 20 Bachteram AM, Mazurek K, Ciborowski JJH. 2005. Sediment suspension by burrowing mayflies (Hexagenia spp., Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). J Gt Lakes Res 31: 208–222. 21 Corkum, LD. 2010. Spatial-temporal patterns of recolonizing adult mayflies in Lake Erie after a major disturbance. J Gt Lakes Res 36: 338–344. 22 Elderkin CL, Corkum LD, Bustos C, Cunningham EL, Berg DJ. 2012. DNA barcoding to confirm morphological traits and determine relative abundance of burrowing mayfly species in western Lake Erie. J Gt Lakes Res 38: 180–186. 23 Friesen MK, Flannagana JF, Lawrencea SG. 1979. Effects of temperature and cold storage on developmental time and viability of eggs of the burrowing mayfly Hexagenia rigida (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae). Can Entomol 111: 665–673. 24 Giberson DJ, Rosenberg DM. 1992. Egg development in Hexagenia limbata (Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae) from Southern Indian Lake, Manitoba: Temperature effects and diapause. J N Am Benthol Soc 11: 194–203. 25 McCafferty WP, Pereira C. 1984. Effects of developmental thermal regimes on two mayfly species and their taxonomic interpretation. Ann Entomol Soc Am 77: 69–87. 26 Van Geest, JL, Poirier DG, Sibley PK, Solomon KR. 2011. Validation of Ontario's new laboratory-based bioaccumulation methods with in situ field data. Environ Toxicol Chem 30: 950–958. 27 Van Geest JL, Poirier DG, Sibley PK, Solomon KR. 2010. Measuring bioaccumulation of contaminants from field-collected sediment in freshwater organisms: A critical review of laboratory methods. Environ Toxicol Chem 29: 2391–2401. 28 Van Geest JL, Poirier DG, Solomon KR, Sibley PK. 2011. A comparison of the bioaccumulation potential of three freshwater organisms to sediment-associated contaminants under laboratory conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 30: 939–949. Citing Literature Volume34, Issue7July 2015Pages 1460-1462 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,958
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,139

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,027
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0030,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0170,014
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0420,038

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,199
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry→Même sujetEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology→Travaux en français237 207→